2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2784285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Office Managing Partners Influence Audit Quality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggest that the complexities and incentives surrounding the provision of NAS are important to consider when reconciling some of the mixed and insignificant results in prior studies. Mowchan () examines the background of audit office managing partners and finds that NAS fees increase when an office changes its leadership to an advisory office managing partner compared to other lines of service, suggesting that office‐level leadership can affect the focus on selling NAS. Francis (, 749) also notes, “the analysis of auditor independence requires a more comprehensive analysis of incentives and the institutional setting in which audit contracting takes place.” By testing the effect of audit fee pressure on a shift in focus to NAS at the office level, and their combined effect on audit quality, our study examines an additional setting where the complexity and incentives surrounding the contracting and provision of NAS are important.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors suggest that the complexities and incentives surrounding the provision of NAS are important to consider when reconciling some of the mixed and insignificant results in prior studies. Mowchan () examines the background of audit office managing partners and finds that NAS fees increase when an office changes its leadership to an advisory office managing partner compared to other lines of service, suggesting that office‐level leadership can affect the focus on selling NAS. Francis (, 749) also notes, “the analysis of auditor independence requires a more comprehensive analysis of incentives and the institutional setting in which audit contracting takes place.” By testing the effect of audit fee pressure on a shift in focus to NAS at the office level, and their combined effect on audit quality, our study examines an additional setting where the complexity and incentives surrounding the contracting and provision of NAS are important.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 NAS are typically high-margin activities, and because partnerships often share profits among partners (Burrows and Black 1998;Liu and Simunic 2005;Maydew and Shackelford 2007), an increase in profits from NAS could help subsidize the loss in profitability of audit engagements for the audit partner. 2 Research suggests that audit office leadership can affect the culture of the office (Pratt and Beaulieu 1992;Mowchan 2016;Aobdia 2017;Lennox and Wu 2018), and focus on NAS or advisory services can affect the behavior of audit partners, potentially reducing the focus on audit quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations