2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj....bjc.6600205...
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do not attempt resuscitation decisions in a cancer centre: addressing difficult ethical and communication issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be reluctance to consider a DNR discussion unless the physician feels there is no remaining effective therapy to offer [32]. Communication may be impeded by confusion over which team member is responsible for this task, or by the myth that RS should be brought up only in older or more seriously ill patients [10,17]. A commonly held belief is that physicians know their own patients well, and therefore know what they would want.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There may be reluctance to consider a DNR discussion unless the physician feels there is no remaining effective therapy to offer [32]. Communication may be impeded by confusion over which team member is responsible for this task, or by the myth that RS should be brought up only in older or more seriously ill patients [10,17]. A commonly held belief is that physicians know their own patients well, and therefore know what they would want.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notation should attest to the assessment that 'attempts at resuscitation would not [be of] benefit'. The diagnosis, time, date and nature of the discussion with the patient and/or family should be recorded, in addition to the specifics of the agreed-upon RS [17]. If such a discussion was not undertaken, the reasons must be stated in the chart [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The outcome of CPR in this group of patients is poor 3 and it is considered a futile intervention. 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] It has been recommended that the attending physician or another member of the health care team should engage the patients and their caregivers in a timely discussion about advance directives regarding end-of-life care and DNR orders. 4,[8][9][10] Many hospitals and other centers have developed explicit guidelines regarding such discussions. 11,12 It has also been suggested that a truly autonomous decision by a patient regarding DNR orders requires provision of contextual information regarding CPR outcomes among hospitalized patients with cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%