Challenge Social Innovation 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Non-humans Make a Difference? The Actor-Network-Theory and the Social Innovation Paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inherent to the concept of social innovation is the centrality of values as social innovations—according to the definition given above—is oriented to overcoming problems left unsolved before (Mulgan et al, 2007 ; Naegele and Heinze, 2012 ). While some scholars prefer a definition of the concept without including the outcome of social innovation as necessarily good (Degelsegger and Kesselring, 2012 ; Pue et al, 2016 ), others, on the other hand, even go so far to include the criterion of “enhancing society's capacity to act” (Hubert et al, 2010 ) or to bring about change to social relations (Martinelli, 2012 ). However, they all share the discard of the Schumpeterian ideal of (private) market competition since the goal of social innovation is essentially considered a contribution to the common good (including, e.g., social capital) in contrast to technological innovation (e.g., gerontechnologies and smart technologies including automation and service robotics) (Klimczuk, 2015b ).…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Social Innovation For An Aging Populamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherent to the concept of social innovation is the centrality of values as social innovations—according to the definition given above—is oriented to overcoming problems left unsolved before (Mulgan et al, 2007 ; Naegele and Heinze, 2012 ). While some scholars prefer a definition of the concept without including the outcome of social innovation as necessarily good (Degelsegger and Kesselring, 2012 ; Pue et al, 2016 ), others, on the other hand, even go so far to include the criterion of “enhancing society's capacity to act” (Hubert et al, 2010 ) or to bring about change to social relations (Martinelli, 2012 ). However, they all share the discard of the Schumpeterian ideal of (private) market competition since the goal of social innovation is essentially considered a contribution to the common good (including, e.g., social capital) in contrast to technological innovation (e.g., gerontechnologies and smart technologies including automation and service robotics) (Klimczuk, 2015b ).…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Social Innovation For An Aging Populamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANT approach is able to successfully identify and explore career options to become a teacher [31]. Another reason that strengthened the opinion above is the opinion [32]. They have proven that the innovation landscape arises as a result of the collaboration between non-human actors and human actors together.…”
Section: Actor-network Theory As An Analytical Framework For Madrasah Entrepreneurship Culturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Workplace innovation represents an approach allocated to organizational change that encourages participative practices and leads to better performance [23,24]. During the past decade, the topic has garnered increased attention and arisen frequently during discussions on innovation [25][26][27].…”
Section: Workplace Innovation In the Hospitality Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%