2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2878768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Non-GAAP Earnings Adjustments Deliver Comparability Benefits?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He finds that analysts often exclude non-cash earnings items, and concludes that analysts make exclusions because of the difference in the relative weights investors place on the different types of underlying earnings components. 3 In addition, Liu and Gao [2016] conclude that Street earnings are more comparable across firms and over time than are GAAP earnings, likely due to the removal of nonrecurring items as well as recurring items subject to measurement error. These studies suggest that analysts do not merely mimic management in making exclusions and that the exclusions are motivated both by analysts' 3 Whipple [2015] associates analysts' forecasted earnings exclusions with each of stock compensation expense, amortization expense, and gains/losses in a hand-collected sample.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He finds that analysts often exclude non-cash earnings items, and concludes that analysts make exclusions because of the difference in the relative weights investors place on the different types of underlying earnings components. 3 In addition, Liu and Gao [2016] conclude that Street earnings are more comparable across firms and over time than are GAAP earnings, likely due to the removal of nonrecurring items as well as recurring items subject to measurement error. These studies suggest that analysts do not merely mimic management in making exclusions and that the exclusions are motivated both by analysts' 3 Whipple [2015] associates analysts' forecasted earnings exclusions with each of stock compensation expense, amortization expense, and gains/losses in a hand-collected sample.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhattacharya et al (2003) and Brown and Sivakumar (2003) provide evidence that street operating earnings are more persistent than GAAP operating income and that market participants perceive them as more relevant. In a similar vein, Liu and Gao (2016) show that street earnings better reflect core and continuing operations following analysts' expertise and professional judgment. Frankel and Lee (1998) use analysts' earnings forecasts to estimate a firm's fundamental value and document a high correlation with both contemporaneous and future stock returns.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Specifically, street earnings may further improve multiple valuation via the identification of more comparable peers. Liu and Gao (2016) empirically show that, following adjustments by analysts and I/B/E/S, street earnings are significantly more comparable than GAAP earnings. This enhanced comparability among firms should then facilitate benchmarking, thereby improving multiple valuation (Young and Zeng, 2015).…”
Section: Prior Literature and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations