2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Natural Experiments of Changes in Neighborhood Built Environment Impact Physical Activity and Diet? A Systematic Review

Abstract: Physical activity and diet are major modifiable risk factors for chronic disease and have been shown to be associated with neighborhood built environment. Systematic review evidence from longitudinal studies on the impact of changing the built environment on physical activity and diet is currently lacking. A systematic review of natural experiments of neighborhood built environment was conducted. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize study characteristics, study quality, and impact of changes in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(353 reference statements)
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They identified 12 natural experimental studies (15 physical activity outcomes) on the basis of having strong experimental designs from three existing systematic reviews; nine of these studies evaluated urban green space interventions. They found that all outcomes had an overall critical ( n = 12) or serious ( n = 3) risk of bias, thus suggesting that the strongest studies conducted to date are weak, a conclusion in line with other recent systematic reviews in this area that included risk of bias assessments [ 15 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…They identified 12 natural experimental studies (15 physical activity outcomes) on the basis of having strong experimental designs from three existing systematic reviews; nine of these studies evaluated urban green space interventions. They found that all outcomes had an overall critical ( n = 12) or serious ( n = 3) risk of bias, thus suggesting that the strongest studies conducted to date are weak, a conclusion in line with other recent systematic reviews in this area that included risk of bias assessments [ 15 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The IPAQ is a non-location specific physical activity tool that has acceptable reliability and moderate concurrent validity when compared with accelerometers (Cerin et al, 2016;Craig et al, 2003). Further, observational (Sundquist et al, 2011) and natural experiment (MacMillan et al, 2018) studies have found associations between IPAQ measured physical activity and neighborhood built characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies have proposed that consuming a health-promoting diet is not necessarily more expensive than unhealthy diet patterns, suggesting that cost may be a perceived rather than an actual barrier to healthy eating (47,48). Changes to the built environment, such as farmers markets, supermarket availability, and menu labeling, have had a generally positive effect on healthy lifestyle behaviors (49,50). Thus, it may be possible to overcome the practical barriers mentioned by nutrition professionals through appropriate environmental and policy changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%