2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do mothers prefer helpers? Birth sex-ratio adjustment in captive callitrichines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, other factors may contribute to population‐level male bias seen here (i.e., Silk and Brown ; Rapaport et al. ), for instance greater potential fitness returns from sons, who, in the wild at least, have more opportunities for extra‐group mating than subordinate daughters who are reproductively suppressed by the dominant female in a group (Ziegler et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, other factors may contribute to population‐level male bias seen here (i.e., Silk and Brown ; Rapaport et al. ), for instance greater potential fitness returns from sons, who, in the wild at least, have more opportunities for extra‐group mating than subordinate daughters who are reproductively suppressed by the dominant female in a group (Ziegler et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a lack of support for the HR hypothesis, Rapaport et al. () did find that in the twinning species, L. rosalia , the sex ratio in singleton births was 65% male compared to 55% in twin litters. They suggest the population‐level male bias results from in utero litter size reduction which is instigated by male fetuses (at the expense of female litter mates).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations