2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do modes of transportation and GPS affect cognitive maps of Londoners?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 However, research elsewhere in applied cognition has found that even pristinely accurate digital tools can disrupt user cognition. For example, use of global positioning software can disrupt participants’ cognitive map formation, leading to poorer wayfinding later without such software compared to those who learned topographies through experience alone (Ishikawa et al, 2008 ; Minaei, 2014 ). Both this set of findings and our own imply that domain-specific digital tools may aid those using them in the moment, but may deleteriously affect learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, research elsewhere in applied cognition has found that even pristinely accurate digital tools can disrupt user cognition. For example, use of global positioning software can disrupt participants’ cognitive map formation, leading to poorer wayfinding later without such software compared to those who learned topographies through experience alone (Ishikawa et al, 2008 ; Minaei, 2014 ). Both this set of findings and our own imply that domain-specific digital tools may aid those using them in the moment, but may deleteriously affect learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the issue is to what extent the GPS device enables an agent to learn how to get around in their local environment without the agent being so reliant on the device that they fail to build up a sufficiently robust cognitive map. The evidence collected by Minaei (2014) and others, discussed above, implies that those who remain too reliant on the device and do not develop a certain level of intellectual autonomy have the worst cognitive maps. But in order for cognitive diligence to operate in this fashion the agents must have a requisite level of wayfinding skills -i.e.…”
Section: Cognitive Diligence In Epistemic Practicesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is no need to have any coordination to an internal cognitive map (and as we shall see shortly below in Section 3.3, this is having an impact on the user's memory). We can characterise this difference in information processing as a contrast between active and passive roles for the epistemic agent (also see Li, Zhu, Zhang, Wu, & Zhang, 2013;Minaei, 2014). By altering how information is processed in regards to the core epistemic tasks of spatial cognition, GPS devices have transformed human cognition.…”
Section: Gps Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the question of how individuals' mental maps and familiar areas affect their decision-making and choice processes with regards to travel, remains unanswered (Minaei, 2014;Mondschein et al, 2010). It has been suggested that individuals have different spacetime environments, given different sets of constraints on satisfying their needs and organising their activities, resulting in different experiences in relation to their environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding these would provide further insight about the relationships between individuals’ spatial cognition, and their travel choices with regards to route, destination, and mode of transport (Golledge and Garling, 2002; Hannes et al., 2008; Mondschein et al., 2006; Susilo and Dijst, 2009, 2010). Thus, from city planning perspective, this insight can be used to build an urban environment with a suitable transport structure and adequate environmental signals that can provide people with a clearer vision of the city and a greater capacity to navigate smoothly through it (Jackson and Kitchin, 1998; Minaei, 2014). From modelling perspectives, the inclusion of individuals’ familiar areas will help to improve accuracy of travel demand models by delineating individuals’ alternatives and destination choice sets that play a role in their travel decision-making processes (Chorus and Timmermans, 2010; Hannes et al., 2010; Janssens et al., 2003), thus minimising the heterogeneity issue in the models.To contribute to this particular research gap, this paper aims to investigate the factors that may influence individuals’ familiarity with areas, and also to explore how individuals’ familiar areas change over time, using four waves of two-week observations (eight weeks of panel data, in total).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%