“…Understanding these would provide further insight about the relationships between individuals’ spatial cognition, and their travel choices with regards to route, destination, and mode of transport (Golledge and Garling, 2002; Hannes et al., 2008; Mondschein et al., 2006; Susilo and Dijst, 2009, 2010). Thus, from city planning perspective, this insight can be used to build an urban environment with a suitable transport structure and adequate environmental signals that can provide people with a clearer vision of the city and a greater capacity to navigate smoothly through it (Jackson and Kitchin, 1998; Minaei, 2014). From modelling perspectives, the inclusion of individuals’ familiar areas will help to improve accuracy of travel demand models by delineating individuals’ alternatives and destination choice sets that play a role in their travel decision-making processes (Chorus and Timmermans, 2010; Hannes et al., 2010; Janssens et al., 2003), thus minimising the heterogeneity issue in the models.To contribute to this particular research gap, this paper aims to investigate the factors that may influence individuals’ familiarity with areas, and also to explore how individuals’ familiar areas change over time, using four waves of two-week observations (eight weeks of panel data, in total).…”