1998
DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.5.e5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Missed Opportunities Stay Missed? A 6-Month Follow-up of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in Inner City Milwaukee Children

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Objectives. To determine 1) the frequency of missed vaccine opportunities (VOs) in inner city children <3 years of age; 2) whether the recommended vaccine(s) were given within 6 months of the missed opportunity (MO); 3) whether these vaccinations were ageappropriate according to the guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; and 4) variables associated with MOs.Design. Retrospective chart review with a nested retrospective cohort of children with MOs.Setting. Two inner city pract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12,[21][22][23][24] We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 2 practice-based research networks (PBRNs), an upstate New York network and a national network of pediatric continuity clinics, to evaluate the impact of provider prompts on adolescent immunization rates. We used communitybased participatory research methods for practitioners to reach a consensus on the intervention to be studied, which converged on provider prompts, and then conducted the intervention in both PBRNs.…”
Section: Results: Intervention and Control Practices Within Eachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,[21][22][23][24] We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 2 practice-based research networks (PBRNs), an upstate New York network and a national network of pediatric continuity clinics, to evaluate the impact of provider prompts on adolescent immunization rates. We used communitybased participatory research methods for practitioners to reach a consensus on the intervention to be studied, which converged on provider prompts, and then conducted the intervention in both PBRNs.…”
Section: Results: Intervention and Control Practices Within Eachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mid-1990s, several studies demonstrated that pediatric practice missed opportunities to administer indicated vaccines at roughly 50% of the encounters. 6,[12][13][14] Our literature search did not yield any studies describing the frequency of vaccination MOs subsequent to the wide dissemination of the NVAC and CDC recommendations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies from the 1990s each found that MOs occurred at roughly one-half of all early childhood health care encounters. 6,12 Two additional studies from the same era found that 50%-75% of children experienced at least one MO by the time they were 24 months old. 13,14 Although the frequencies of MOs reported in the earlier studies are in the same range as our own, the previously reported frequencies are slightly lower likely in part because those studies examined only 3 or 4 vaccine series (vs the 7 in our study) and had relatively low thresholds for valid medical contraindication to vaccination (eg, low-grade fever, history of fever in the last week, mild respiratory illness, sinusitis, and the need for follow up within 48 hours) reflecting the recommendations of the time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las causas argumentadas por los padres para los atrasos o no inmunización tienen las limitaciones propias del uso de una anamnesis remota; no hay, sin embargo, otra forma de rescatar esta información y es un método usado en numerosos estudios sobre adherencia a vacunación 12,13,[15][16][17]27 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified