2007
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e31815a9245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Men and Women Differ on Measures of Mental Stress-Induced Ischemia?

Abstract: Results of this study showed no significant differences between men and women on measures of hemodynamic functioning or cardiac perfusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was not due to more pronounced hemodynamic responses to stress in female patients, as hemodynamic data were similar in women and men, consistent with previous studies (30). A possible mechanism is a higher burden of psychosocial risk factors in women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding was not due to more pronounced hemodynamic responses to stress in female patients, as hemodynamic data were similar in women and men, consistent with previous studies (30). A possible mechanism is a higher burden of psychosocial risk factors in women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a study of 58 IHD patients (6 women), women showed a larger -but only borderline significant- ejection fraction reduction with mental stress than men, an effect not seen among normal controls (38). Another study of stable, broadly defined cardiac patients found no significant sex differences in myocardial perfusion abnormalities in response to mental stress (30). However, only about 1/4 of the patients had a previous MI, and the age ranged from 39 to 83 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study by York et al (40), which examined a comparable cohort of females, failed to show a significant difference in the rate of MSIMI between men and women. However, their study employed myocardial perfusion imaging techniques (40), whereas our study utilized real-time stress echocardiography as a means of detecting MSIMI. Differences in our findings may speak to the underlying pathophysiological basis of MSIMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Samad et al 41 recently reported a significantly higher prevalence of MSIMI among women compared with men using wall motion abnormalities and LVEF reductions on echocardiography. Surprisingly, York et al 42 failed to reproduce these findings in a comparable cohort of females using myocardial perfusion imaging techniques. Samad et al argue that perfusion abnormalities identify obstructive coronary disease, whereas wall motion abnormalities are considered a downstream effect of myocardial ischaemia.…”
Section: Assessment Of Msimimentioning
confidence: 98%