2000
DOI: 10.1177/a011398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do means-tested benefits alleviate poverty?: Evidence on Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom from the Luxembourg Income Study

Abstract: This article analyses the relationship between means-tested benefits and poverty in Western Europe. Means-tested benefits, as social assistance or housing benefits, are designed as safeguards against poverty for the low-income strata of the population, but our knowledge on their impact is fairly limited. How effective are they in reducing poverty rates? To what degree can they fill the gap that income redistribution through taxes and non-means-tested social security benefits leaves? How large is the impact of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…others' estimation of benefits in the micro-data of the LIS (Behrendt 2000;Mahler and Jesuit 2006;Smeeding 2006). This measure calculates the equivalized value of total government assistance received by single mother and all households in each country in the LIS.…”
Section: Country-level Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…others' estimation of benefits in the micro-data of the LIS (Behrendt 2000;Mahler and Jesuit 2006;Smeeding 2006). This measure calculates the equivalized value of total government assistance received by single mother and all households in each country in the LIS.…”
Section: Country-level Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If people want to claim welfare, they have to demonstrate need. Welfare benefits in the Netherlands are characterized by income and/or assets tests, and are means-tested (Behrendt, 2000;p. 24).…”
Section: The Bureaucratic Field and The Symbolic Strugglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, they presume that means tested benefits are meagre, they are associated with stigma, and the administration of benefits is characterised by stringency and intervention in private lives. Other researchers, for example, Tony Eardley et al (1996), Francis Castles (1997), andChristina Behrendt (2000) have underlined cross-national variations in means tested benefits. A major weakness of the poverty regime is its unclear theoretical status and problematic relationship to the concept of welfare state regime.…”
Section: Poverty Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%