1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00289802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong case can be made for our less stringent categorization procedure, based on people's tendency to assume that a person or animal is male in the absence of strong cues that it is female. Such a tendency has been shown in studies on the People = Male bias (Cole, Hill, & Dayley, 1983;Hamilton, 1991) and the Animal = Male bias (Lambdin, Greer, Jibotian, Wood, & Hamilton, 2003). Hamilton et al and Cole et al found that when a person is referred to without any cues about sex, that person is generally believed to be male.…”
Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A strong case can be made for our less stringent categorization procedure, based on people's tendency to assume that a person or animal is male in the absence of strong cues that it is female. Such a tendency has been shown in studies on the People = Male bias (Cole, Hill, & Dayley, 1983;Hamilton, 1991) and the Animal = Male bias (Lambdin, Greer, Jibotian, Wood, & Hamilton, 2003). Hamilton et al and Cole et al found that when a person is referred to without any cues about sex, that person is generally believed to be male.…”
Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Martyna (1978) attacked the use of he to refer to both sexes on the grounds of: (1) ambiguity-it may be difficult to determine whether a particular he is meant to include or exclude she; (2) exclusiveness-the injustice of excluding a female interpretation; (3) inequity-the nonparallelism between the masculine and the feminine pronouns. Although Cole, Hill, and Dayley (1983) found no support for a pure generic he pronoun effect on individuals' tendency to think more often of male referents, some evidence was found for a masculine bias when the word man was combined with he. MacKay and Fulkerson (1979) asked their participants to judge whether women were included in sentences that contained masculine pronouns, and they measured participants' reaction time and error rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This practice has been objected to as reflecting an androcentric world-view, insofar as it can be unclear whether the forms include both men and women or whether they refer to men only and, as Briere and Lanktree (1983), Cole, Hill and Dayley (1983), Hamilton (1988), and others have shown, people rarely conceptualize women when masculine "generics" are used. A strategy adopted by writers to avoid masculine generic pronouns is the use of paired pronoun expressions such as he/she, he or she, him or her and his or her.…”
Section: Masculine Generic Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 94%