Abstract:RESUMO O artigo é uma condensação de diferentes textos em que seu autor introduz coletâneas sobre o pensamento cepalino, que ele vem organizando desde 1998. Apresenta os elementos metodológicos e analíticos centrais à construção teórica estruturalista latino-americana, presentes tanto no período estruturalista (1949-1990), quanto no neo-estruturalista (desde 1990). Em seguida, sintetiza brevemente a evolução do pensamento estruturalista ao longo das sete décadas de sua existência.
“…This is the modus operandi of political movements led by Vargas and Lula in Brazil, Perón and Kirchner in Argentina, and Chavez in Venezuela. Structuralist ideas find fertile ground and become deeply entrenched in Latin American economic thinking, where they remain influential (Almeida Filho & Corrêa, 2011;Bielschowsky, 2020).…”
Section: Historical Background: Ideology and Populismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the policy level, ECLAC theorists indicate that the State needs to intervene in the economy to alleviate the consequences of a structural center-periphery system and to make up for the absence of a bourgeoisie capable of supporting economic development. This intervention is to be carried out by deploying a centralized industrialization plan (Bielschowsky, 2020;Furtado, 1966Furtado, , 1974. This is indispensable; development cannot happen in the periphery in any other way.…”
Section: Eclac the Structuralist School And Its Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the industrialization of Brazil (and somewhat of Argentina), the countries in the region have, in comparison, grown less than their counterparts elsewhere in the globe (International Monetary Fund, 2021). However, the importance of structuralism to the history of Latin, and South America in specific, is undeniable (Bielschowsky, 2020;Medeiros & Cosentino, 2020). This importance suggests that the school should be scrutinized from other theoretical standpoints.…”
To a large part, Latin American economic thought is rooted in the view that the State should be the engine of economic development. The theory developed by the Latin American Structuralist School supports this view. ECLAC, a United Nations development commission, is the bastion of the policy agenda branch of structuralism. Despite their central role in Latin American economic policies, structuralist ideas have hardly been discussed. We trace the historical origins of this school and use the theoretical standpoint of the Austrian School of Economics to talk about its views and mistakes.
“…This is the modus operandi of political movements led by Vargas and Lula in Brazil, Perón and Kirchner in Argentina, and Chavez in Venezuela. Structuralist ideas find fertile ground and become deeply entrenched in Latin American economic thinking, where they remain influential (Almeida Filho & Corrêa, 2011;Bielschowsky, 2020).…”
Section: Historical Background: Ideology and Populismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the policy level, ECLAC theorists indicate that the State needs to intervene in the economy to alleviate the consequences of a structural center-periphery system and to make up for the absence of a bourgeoisie capable of supporting economic development. This intervention is to be carried out by deploying a centralized industrialization plan (Bielschowsky, 2020;Furtado, 1966Furtado, , 1974. This is indispensable; development cannot happen in the periphery in any other way.…”
Section: Eclac the Structuralist School And Its Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the industrialization of Brazil (and somewhat of Argentina), the countries in the region have, in comparison, grown less than their counterparts elsewhere in the globe (International Monetary Fund, 2021). However, the importance of structuralism to the history of Latin, and South America in specific, is undeniable (Bielschowsky, 2020;Medeiros & Cosentino, 2020). This importance suggests that the school should be scrutinized from other theoretical standpoints.…”
To a large part, Latin American economic thought is rooted in the view that the State should be the engine of economic development. The theory developed by the Latin American Structuralist School supports this view. ECLAC, a United Nations development commission, is the bastion of the policy agenda branch of structuralism. Despite their central role in Latin American economic policies, structuralist ideas have hardly been discussed. We trace the historical origins of this school and use the theoretical standpoint of the Austrian School of Economics to talk about its views and mistakes.
“…Em um primeiro momento, será apresentada a evolução do pensamento da Cepal, desde sua constituição, em 1948, até a atualidade, conforme descrito na literatura em dois períodos, basicamente: um período estruturalista e um segundo momento neoestruturalista (a partir de 1990) (BIESLCHOWSKY, 2020).…”
unclassified
“…A periferia é produtora, fornecedora de mão de obra, já o centro é produtivo, o que normalmente gera interdependência, pouca diversificação e, para além disso, muitas vezes, perda de aspectos regionais, como hábitos da população. Como consequência, criam-se massas que não sabem agir para além do homogeneizado, devido à produção industrial massificada (BIESLCHOWSKY, 2020).…”
Resumo:
Este ensaio tem como objetivo analisar o desenvolvimento histórico do pensamento cepalino nos períodos estruturalista e neoestruturalista. Nesse sentido, são descritas as principais alterações ocorridas desde 1948, quando os estudos estavam ainda muito focados na industrialização como sinônimo de Desenvolvimento. Com o passar dos tempos, principalmente após os anos 1990, os estudos incluíram elementos estruturais, como a gestão ambiental e a desigualdade, trazendo aproximações com o conceito de gestão social que requer uma análise interpretativa dos fenômenos sociais e organizacionais necessitando de uma visão mais focada no bem comum, evidenciando que formas de organização da produção mais flexíveis e alinhadas ás demandas sociais envolvendo questões multidimensionais e na mobilização de todos os agentes da sociedade.
All the contents of this work, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.Todo o conteúdo deste trabalho, exceto quando houver ressalva, é publicado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribição 4.0.Todo el contenido de esta obra, excepto donde se indique lo contrario, está bajo licencia de la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento 4.0.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.