People can accept the terrible things happen, if truth and accountability follow; it is fundamental to the belief that you live in a decent society (Tempany, 2016, p 372) On the 15 th April 1989, in a semifinal FA cup clash between Liverpool F.C. and Nottingham Forest F.C, played at the home of Sheffield Wednesday F.C, Hillsborough, ninety-six Liverpool fans were crushed to death and 766 injured in the standing terracing in the West Stand of the ground. This event sparked controversy, at the time, and has had a significant impact on the field of football, British society (Tempany, 2016) and the British police force. At the time, the police, totally unjustly, blamed the disaster on the fans. This blame was reinforced by the police force leaking of a series of lies about both their own culpability and the behaviour of Liverpool fans, to the popular press and the local MP. This was followed by the systematic falsification of police statements. The bereaved families and aligned social movements embarked on a campaign, in the face of a mendacious, bigoted, callous "establishment", to hold those who were culpable for the events which led to the horrific deaths to account. Their battle for justice and accountability was partially concluded on 26 th April, 2016 when a jury found that the victims of the disaster were unlawfully killed. This opened the door for charges to be laid against the key actors. In June 2016, it was announced that six men would be charged by the British Crown Prosecution Service. These included Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield, match commander, who would face 95 1 charges of manslaughter by gross negligence 2. Subsequently, Sir Norman Bettison, a former Chief Inspector of South Yorkshire Police, who was accused of misconduct in a public office by telling lies about the culpability of the Liverpool fans, had all charges against him dropped by the Criminal Prosecution Service, because of changes in the evidence of two witnesses and the death of a third (BBC News, 2018 3).This outcome was met with dismay by the Hillsborough Family Support Group (BBC News, 2018 3). This paper is concerned with the thirty year (ongoing) battle for accountability. Accountability is multivalenced. Cooper and Johnston's (2012), work on accountability and football, drawing from the work of Bourdieu and Wacquant (2001), argued that accountability has become a "vulgate", commonly used word which appears to be "socially progressive" but in practice has taken on multiple meanings such that it lacks political force. In spite of its progressive undertones, the word accountability is commonly used in management control systems to mean that employees at all levels are "accountable" to their superiors, and to shareholders. This managerial form of accountability frequently may involve the outputs of employees, divisions, departments and so on being rendered "transparent" through various output metrics. Government accountability has come to take this form. Performance metrics have now become a key form of state accountability (