2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12176984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?

Abstract: The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that positive emotions are associated with self-regulated learning, while negative emotions are not, is consistent with previous research (De la Fuente et al, 2020 ), indicating that maintaining positive emotional states promotes more significant learning involvement. Likewise, as Hendrie and Bastacini ( 2020 ) state, positive and negative emotions influence people's judgment of their performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The fact that positive emotions are associated with self-regulated learning, while negative emotions are not, is consistent with previous research (De la Fuente et al, 2020 ), indicating that maintaining positive emotional states promotes more significant learning involvement. Likewise, as Hendrie and Bastacini ( 2020 ) state, positive and negative emotions influence people's judgment of their performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Academic subjects were not grouped a priori according to regulatory, nonregulatory, or dysregulatory teaching systems, something which would have made it possible to attribute a cause to this factor, nor were students categorized as practicing self-regulated, nonregulated, or dysregulated learning. Nonetheless, recent research has documented this (de la Fuente et al, 2019(de la Fuente et al, , 2020d. Future research should clarify these aspects, given that the pandemic continues to persist, and we will have the opportunity to analyze these variables.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Lines Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…approach (deep vs. surface) and achievement emotions (positive vs. negative), respectively (de la Fuente et al, 2020e).…”
Section: Knowing (Knowledge)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second case, factors and adjustments that are most dysregulatory toward the learning process must be identified (e.g., drastic changes in content, methodologies, timing, and assessment). These must be avoided or corrected (de la Fuente et al, 2020e). 2) Process factors: Certain intervention strategies are suggested for maximizing the stress-buffering effect of the SLPS competency.…”
Section: ) Presage Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%