2001
DOI: 10.2307/3657810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Learners Notice Enhanced Forms while Interacting with the L2?: An Online and Offline Study of the Role of Written Input Enhancement in L2 Reading

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
152
4
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
15
152
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last 2 decades or so, visual input enhancement studies have been conducted to achieve the goal of teaching grammatical elements implicitly, mostly through reading activities (Alanen 1995;Cho 2010;Combs 2008;Doughty 1991;Izumi 2002;Gascoigne, 2006;Kelly 2008;Lee 2007;Lee & Haung 2008;Leow 1998Leow , 2001Leow & Morgan-Short, 2004;Mueller 2010;Overstreet 1998;Rezvani 2011;Sarkhosh 2012;Simard 2009;Song 2007;White 1998;Wong 2003Wong , 2005 and the method has been described as the least explicit and the least intrusive method of focus on form (Doughty & Varela, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last 2 decades or so, visual input enhancement studies have been conducted to achieve the goal of teaching grammatical elements implicitly, mostly through reading activities (Alanen 1995;Cho 2010;Combs 2008;Doughty 1991;Izumi 2002;Gascoigne, 2006;Kelly 2008;Lee 2007;Lee & Haung 2008;Leow 1998Leow , 2001Leow & Morgan-Short, 2004;Mueller 2010;Overstreet 1998;Rezvani 2011;Sarkhosh 2012;Simard 2009;Song 2007;White 1998;Wong 2003Wong , 2005 and the method has been described as the least explicit and the least intrusive method of focus on form (Doughty & Varela, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effectiveness of the instructional treatments depends on the methodological approaches adopted. In evaluating the tasks achieved following FFI, Fotos&Ellis(1991), Fotos (1993), and Leow (2001) noticed that some of the FFI tasks were incorporated more explicitly and that "raising grammar consciousness" is one of these tasks, whereby, the task objective given to learners is to solve a grammar problem using the target structure or to generate grammar rules. That is, the aim behind not giving the target-like forms directly to the L2 learners, but providing them with corrective feedback and allowing them to analyze their errors/mistakes is that it gives them the space to interact, negotiate and work out the rules for themselves which makes them more memorable.…”
Section: Form-focused Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies over the past decade have debated the instructional effect of an input-based approach, namely, input enhancement (Leow, 2001(Leow, , 2007(Leow, , 2009a. According to Schmidt (1990), noticing the form in the input is a prerequisite for intake.…”
Section: Input Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%