2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Intensity Ratings and Skin Conductance Responses Reliably Discriminate Between Different Stimulus Intensities in Experimentally Induced Pain?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of gender differences in pain perception has been studied extensively. The existing literature seems far from clear as to which gender perceives greater pain in response to stimulus, with reports of greater perceived pain in both men and women . A recent study by Butcher and Carmody found gender to be important in determining response to analgesia, and it is likely that such factors will play a role in pain perceptions in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The issue of gender differences in pain perception has been studied extensively. The existing literature seems far from clear as to which gender perceives greater pain in response to stimulus, with reports of greater perceived pain in both men and women . A recent study by Butcher and Carmody found gender to be important in determining response to analgesia, and it is likely that such factors will play a role in pain perceptions in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the laboratory, QST typically involves the administration of calibrated noxious stimuli and the assessment of participants’ pain responses using a visual analogue scale (VAS). QST methods are commonly used to assess inter-individual differences in somatosensory function and pain sensitivity (Arendt-Nielsen et al, 2009; Edwards et al, 2005a; Fillingim and Lautenbacher, 2004; Greenspan et al, 2011; Yarnitsky and Pud, 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak-to-base response amplitude of skin conductance was used as an index of SCR [40][41][42]. For the assessment of SCRs, the difference between the maximum value detected in a 6 s post-stimulus time window and the baseline (3 s pre-stimulus) was computed, which is comparable with other studies in which a time frame of 1-5 s after stimulus onset was chosen [43][44][45].…”
Section: Scr Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%