Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015

Abstract

Background: Inquiry-based teaching (IBT) and improving school climate are the two most commonly used strategies for fostering learning and critical thinking skills in students. IBT has positioned itself as one of the most recommended "active" methodologies for developing intellectual autonomy and complex thought processes, whereas school climate is considered to be a protective factor that helps mitigate adverse conditions and has a positive impact on teaching and learning. This study investigates the relationship between IBT and school climate with the academic performance of Colombian students in the PISA 2015 test. Results: Using a two-level Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM), the results show a negative association between IBT and students' scientific performance in the test. However, results show a positive association between IBT and students' self-reported critical thinking skills. Results also show that school climate is a positive moderating factor on learning. Contextual factors such as the student's grade level at the time of sitting for the PISA test, gender, and socioeconomic characteristics are strong predictors of science achievement in PISA. Conclusions: These results reveal the need for additional research on the effect of the so-called active methodologies and school context on student learning. Regarding IBT, it seems that its influence is greater on student's perception and motivation, than in acquisition of scientific knowledge. Positive school climate is a protective factor that can help to improve student learning. In Colombia, the quality of students' educational outcomes has largely been attributed to their socioeconomic background. However, the results of this study show that, although students' and schools' socioeconomic characteristics continue to be strong predictors of academic performance, teaching practices can have an even larger impact.

Using Machine Learning Approaches to Explore Non-Cognitive Variables Influencing Reading Proficiency in English among Filipino Learners

“…Consistent with previous studies also [45,52], three important predictors in the SVM model relate to students' perceptions regarding their social experiences in school. BEING-BULLIED is the index that measures students' exposure to bullying, and the poor reading proficiency students report higher values on this index.…”

Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy

“…In a follow-up experimental context, the SLA can also be distributed as a pre-and post-test to compare diverse teaching methods or integrated in longitudinal analyses to report modification in demonstrated knowledge, beliefs, and values. Inquiry-based teaching, group dialogue and STEM-based teaching, game-based teaching can improve students' SL (Botes, 2022;Gómez & Suárez, 2020;Pebriani et al, 2022;Peffer & Ramezani, 2019;Suryaningsih et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022;Warfa et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2021).…”

The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientific and mathematical literacies

“…Findings from the 2015 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have indicated that inquiry-based instruction is positively correlated with student learning outcomes (Teig, 2021;Teig et al, 2018). However, a secondary analysis of PISA 2015 data from Taiwan (Liou, 2021) and 72 countries revealed a negative association between inquiry-based teaching and students' scientific literacy (Gómez & Suárez, 2020). Similar results were found through analysis of PISA 2006 data, confirming that science students who report engaging in low levels of inquiry activities show above-average levels of science literacy (McConney et al, 2014).…”