2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do illustrations enhance preschoolers’ memories for stories? Age-related change in the picture facilitation effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to tune into the visual illustrations while simultaneously processing the oral narratives may have made the material more tangible, allowing the children with hearing loss to create a better framework in which to organize the verbal content (Levin & Mayer, 1993). Similar facilitation effects of illustrations have previously been reported for children without hearing loss (Greenhoot & Semb, 2008). Illustrations are typically representative of the story content, as they were in the case of the test story used in this investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The ability to tune into the visual illustrations while simultaneously processing the oral narratives may have made the material more tangible, allowing the children with hearing loss to create a better framework in which to organize the verbal content (Levin & Mayer, 1993). Similar facilitation effects of illustrations have previously been reported for children without hearing loss (Greenhoot & Semb, 2008). Illustrations are typically representative of the story content, as they were in the case of the test story used in this investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, this hypothesis parallels the dual representation hypothesis (DeLoache, 2000;Uttal, Scudder, & DeLoache, 1997), an empirically supported developmental hypothesis suggesting that young children, around 30 months of age, are often unaware that instructional manipulatives are representations of abstract contexts. As noted earlier, Greenhoot and Semb (2008) found analogous age-related differences in preschool students' ability to benefit from pictures provided with narratives. On the basis of these related findings, it is of considerable interest to identify developmental transitions in children's picture-processing and imagery-generation abilities.…”
Section: The Imagery Effectsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Greenhoot and Semb (2008) performed a listening study with preschool children that framed its theoretical predictions within dual-coding theory. In this study, children listened to stories under one of four presentation formats: (a) verbal and picture, in which children listened to a story along with pictures of story events; (b) verbal and irrelevant picture, in which children listened to a story accompanied by unrelated pictures; (c) verbal only, in which children listened to stories without pictorial support; and (d) picture only, in which children viewed pictures of story events.…”
Section: Dual-coding Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2002; Garner, Gillingham, & White, 1989;Greenhoot & Semb, 2008). However, to date, few studies have explored the neural correlates of reading comprehension in the presence of illustrations, and, to the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first study using fMRI to explore the effects of text illustrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%