Do Hospitals Participating in Accountable Care Organizations Discharge Patients to Higher Quality Nursing Homes?

Abstract

A ccountable care organizations (ACOs) create incentives for more efficient healthcare utilization. For patients being discharged from the hospital, this may mean more efficient use of postacute care (PAC), including discharging patients to higher quality skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in an effort to limit readmissions and other costly complications. Public reporting of nursing home quality has been associated with improved performance measures, although improvements in preventable hospitalizations have lagged. 1 Evidence to date suggests that patients attributed to an ACO are not going to higher quality SNFs, 2,3 but these effects may be concentrated in hospitals that participate in ACOs and face stronger incentives to alter their discharge patterns compared with non-ACO hospitals. Therefore, we examined whether hospitals participating in Medicare's Shared Saving Program (MSSP) increased the use of highly rated SNFs or decreased the use of low-rated SNFs hospital-wide after initiation of their ACO contracts compared with non-ACO hospitals. METHODSWe used discharge-level data from the 100% MedPAR file for all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries discharged from an acute care hospital to an SNF between 2010 and 2013. We measured the SNF quality using Medicare's Nursing Home Compare star ratings. Our primary outcome was probability of discharge to high-rated (five star) and low-rated (one star) SNFs.We utilized a difference-in-differences design. Using a linear probability model, we first estimated the change in the probability of discharge to five-star SNFs (compared to all other SNFs) among all beneficiaries discharged from one of the 233 ACO-participating hospitals after the hospital became an ACO provider compared with before and compared with all beneficiaries discharged from one of the 3,081 non-ACO hospitals over the same time period. Individual hospitals were determined to be "ACO-participating" if they were listed on Medicare's website as being part of an ACO-participating hospital in the MSSP. ACOs joined the MSSP in three waves: April 1, 2012; July 1, 2012; and January 1, 2013, which were also determined based on information on Medicare's website. We separately estimated the change in probability of discharge to a one-star SNF (compared to all other SNFs) using the same approach. Models were adjusted for beneficiary demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, race, dual eligibility, urban ZIP code, diagnosis-related group code, and Elixhauser comorbidities) and market characteristics (the concentration of hospital discharges, SNF discharges, and the number of fivestar SNFs, all measured in each hospital referral region). RESULTSWe examined a total of 12,736,287 discharges, 11.8% from ACO-participating hospitals and 88.2% from non-ACO-participating hospitals. ACO-participating hospitals cared for fewer black patients and fewer patients who were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid (Table 1), but these characteris-We examined whether hospitals participating in Medicare's Shared Saving Pro...

The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature

“…Under this payment model, quality tended to improve and, if not, to remain stable [40,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. The same was true for spending [59-61, 66-68, 72-89], whereas the effects on utilization were more diverse [41, 58-61, 63, 67, 68, 72, 74-76, 82-84, 86, 88, 90-100].…”

Accountable Care Organizations, Skilled Nursing Facilities, and Nurse Practitioners

“…Some ACOs have created preferred SNF networks, gently steering patients to providers where they may have overlapping staff, shared trainings, or a bi-directional flow of information. There is evidence of positive steering 4 , 5 and decreased readmissions rates within ACOs. 6 At the Institute for Accountable Care (IAC), we have noted that the mean SNF stay costs for ACO beneficiaries in 2021 was $16,362, compared with $20,954 for fee-for-service beneficiaries, further hinting at some form of positive steering to efficient facilities.…”