2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac96ef
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do High-spin High-mass X-Ray Binaries Contribute to the Population of Merging Binary Black Holes?

Abstract: Gravitational-wave observations of binary black hole (BBH) systems point to black hole spin magnitudes being relatively low. These measurements appear in tension with high spin measurements for high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs). We use grids of MESA simulations combined with the rapid population-synthesis code COSMIC to examine the origin of these two binary populations. It has been suggested that Case-A mass transfer while both stars are on the main sequence can form high-spin BHs in HMXBs. Assuming this forma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of BH spins can be used to construct a unified view of stellar-mass BH formation and evolution in binary systems. While high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) systems are ideal candidates to link the population of XBs to that of BBHs, as they contain a BH and a massive star that could also evolve to produce a secondary BH, Gallegos-Garcia et al (2022) find that only up to 11% of HMXBs that experience an accretion episode while both stars are still on the main sequence (case A mass transfer) can evolve to eventually form a merging BBH system, and that at most 20% of merging BBH systems originate from case A HMXBs. Additionally, Liotine et al (2023) find that observational selection effects can further divide the link between HMXBs and BBHs through the fact that only around 0.6% of detectable HMXBs could produce a BBH system that would merge in a Hubble time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of BH spins can be used to construct a unified view of stellar-mass BH formation and evolution in binary systems. While high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) systems are ideal candidates to link the population of XBs to that of BBHs, as they contain a BH and a massive star that could also evolve to produce a secondary BH, Gallegos-Garcia et al (2022) find that only up to 11% of HMXBs that experience an accretion episode while both stars are still on the main sequence (case A mass transfer) can evolve to eventually form a merging BBH system, and that at most 20% of merging BBH systems originate from case A HMXBs. Additionally, Liotine et al (2023) find that observational selection effects can further divide the link between HMXBs and BBHs through the fact that only around 0.6% of detectable HMXBs could produce a BBH system that would merge in a Hubble time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…find that based on the existing sample of GW measurements, at most 26% of the underlying BBH population originates from "hierarchical mergers" (repeated mergers of smaller BHs). While works such as Olejak & Belczynski (2021) argue that the observed distribution of BBHs is consistent with formation from isolated binaries, Gallegos-Garcia et al (2022) find that at most 20% of BBHs originate from HMXB systems formed through Case-A mass transfer and that at most 11% of Case-A HMXB systems evolve into BBHs and XBs are not only observed to be different , but are intrinsically different. In the future, expanding and comparing the two spin samples will allow placing better constraints on BH formation and evolution mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The importance of natal kicks for merging the asymmetric CEB systems is evident in Figure 3, which shows the difference in second kick magnitudes received by merging systems (top panel) compared to those received by non-merging systems (bottom panel). The role of natal kicks in merging binary NSs was recently highlighted by Gallegos-Garcia et al (2022). In general, natal kicks tend to be smaller for larger m 2 , a consequence of the assumed supernova prescription in which smaller compact objects are born from more explosive supernovae that impart larger kicks (Fryer et al 2012).…”
Section: Impact Of Natal Kicksmentioning
confidence: 98%