2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients benefit from the use of trastuzumab beyond disease progression? A mono-institutional experience and systematic review of observational studies

Abstract: Though preclinical evidence supports the protracted use of trastuzumab to reach sustained anti-tumor activity, the activity of trastuzumab beyond disease progression remains controversial in HER-2 over-expressing (HER-2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 59 patients with HER-2 + MBC treated at our institution with trastuzumab-based therapies. Our results were added to those obtained in similar observational studies and summary estimates for overall response (OR) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While a number of retrospective analyses have shown a potential advantage for the "continuation policy" (reviewed in [3][4][5][6]) in agreement with our results, two retrospective studies indicated no statistically significant benefit from continuing trastuzumab [17,6]. In these studies, carried out by the same group, the authors themselves suggest that patients continuing trastuzumab might have been subject to closer clinical evaluation because of the weekly administration schedule of the antibody compared to the control arm of untreated patients, and an earlier detection of disease progression may have partially clouded the benefit of continuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While a number of retrospective analyses have shown a potential advantage for the "continuation policy" (reviewed in [3][4][5][6]) in agreement with our results, two retrospective studies indicated no statistically significant benefit from continuing trastuzumab [17,6]. In these studies, carried out by the same group, the authors themselves suggest that patients continuing trastuzumab might have been subject to closer clinical evaluation because of the weekly administration schedule of the antibody compared to the control arm of untreated patients, and an earlier detection of disease progression may have partially clouded the benefit of continuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients may develop resistance to trastuzumab and show metastatic disease progression. Several retrospective studies published thus far (reviewed in [3,4]) [5,6] have indicated a certain overall response rate, clinical benefit and extended time to progression from the use of a second trastuzumabcontaining regimen in HER2-positive MBC patients who progressed on first-line trastuzumab treatment. Moreover, two recent randomized trials designed to directly evaluate the efficacy of continuing trastuzumab after progression demonstrated the potential clinical utility of continuing trastuzumab even for patients with progressive disease [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experience confirms other analysis with patients who received second-line trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease. They achieved a median OS significantly better than those discontinuing trastuzumab at disease progression [14][15][16][17]13] The long term use of trastuzumab raises concerns about cardiotoxicity. An early pivotal trial showed a high incidence of cardiac events under the treatment of trastuzumab, especially when associated with anthracyclines [8].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not currently approved by the Brazilian National Agency of Health Surveillance (ANVISA) for use after disease progression is observed, observational data support clinical benefits with TRAST/CAP continuation. 13 Another treatment option currently includes lapatinib combined with capecitabine (LAP/CAP), which is also supported by clinical evidence. 14 In addition, LAP/CAP is approved for use in Brazil in patients with MBC following initial treatment with TRAST/CAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%