2016
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do hand preferences predict stacking skill during infancy?

Abstract: The cascade theory of handedness suggests that hand preferences develop from a history of cascading and sequentially developing manual asymmetries for a variety of actions. Infants who consistently use their preferred hand for a variety of actions likely would gain proficiency using that preferred hand and, consequently, perform more proficiently on other challenging manual tasks. One such task is object stacking, which has been linked with a number of cognitive abilities. If infant hand preference facilitates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case, for example, for chimpanzees, when fishing termites using a stick: individuals with a strong preference to consistently use one hand (regardless of whether it is the left or the right one) are more efficient than individuals that do not have any preference to use one or the other hand [15]. Children with consistent early hand preferences exhibit advanced patterns of cognitive development compared to children who develop a hand preference later, although this could be a matter of synchronized development [16]. Strongly lateralized parrots showing a significant foot and eye preference are better at solving novel problems, such as a pebble-seed discrimination test and a string-pull problem, than less strongly lateralized parrots [17].…”
Section: Advantages Of Having An Asymmetrical Brain (At the Individuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case, for example, for chimpanzees, when fishing termites using a stick: individuals with a strong preference to consistently use one hand (regardless of whether it is the left or the right one) are more efficient than individuals that do not have any preference to use one or the other hand [15]. Children with consistent early hand preferences exhibit advanced patterns of cognitive development compared to children who develop a hand preference later, although this could be a matter of synchronized development [16]. Strongly lateralized parrots showing a significant foot and eye preference are better at solving novel problems, such as a pebble-seed discrimination test and a string-pull problem, than less strongly lateralized parrots [17].…”
Section: Advantages Of Having An Asymmetrical Brain (At the Individuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistency of a hand preference across infancy (6–14 months) and toddlerhood (18–24 months) predicted advances in language skills at 3 years of age (Nelson et al, 2017 ). An infant hand preference predicted advances in infant and toddler object construction skills (i.e., stacking blocks) that is thought to both reflect and contribute to the development of spatial knowledge (Marcinowski et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptive information of this study sheds light on how different kinds of object construction change from infancy through toddlerhood. Some have proposed that the development of object construction skills could affect or reflect cognitive and language development (e.g., Greenfield, ; Marcinowski et al., ; Michel, Campbell, Marcinowski, Nelson, & Babik, ). We suggest three avenues of research for future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants and toddlers are capable of performing these construction skills and will do so spontaneously. In pilot work for an earlier project, we found that 9‐month‐old infants were not performing any successful combinations (Marcinowski et al., ), suggesting that 10 months was the appropriate age to start examining construction abilities in infants. We selected the toddler time points because children have been shown to increase the number of constructions across this period (Lifter & Bloom, ), and we expected to capture a wider range of construction skills and strategies in the older age band.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation