2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.262701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Halo Nuclei Follow Rutherford Elastic Scattering at Energies Below the Barrier? The Case ofLi11

Abstract: The first measurement of the elastic scattering of the halo nucleus 11 Li and its core 9 Li on 208 Pb at energies near the Coulomb barrier is presented. The 11 Li þ 208 Pb elastic scattering shows a strong reduction with respect to the Rutherford cross section, even at energies well below the barrier and down to very small scattering angles. This drastic change of the elastic differential cross section observed in 11 Li þ 208 Pb is the consequence of the halo structure of 11 Li, as it is not observed in the el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15]. Here, we present the breakup data and the corresponding theoretical analysis in terms of semiclassical and coupled-channels calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15]. Here, we present the breakup data and the corresponding theoretical analysis in terms of semiclassical and coupled-channels calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] and references therein). This was the aim of the experiment performed at the TRI-University Meson Facility (TRIUMF) for the 11 Li+ 208 Pb reaction at energies around (29.8 MeV) and below (24.3 MeV) the Coulomb barrier (V B ≈ 28 MeV) [22,23]. As expected, the experiment showed a strong reduction of the elastic cross section with respect to the Rutherford formula and a large yield of 9 Li fragments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…III. They show a remarkable suppression of the 11 Li elastic cross section with respect to the Rutherford formula [22], even at very forward angles. Note that data oscillations around 75…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations