Do green buildings capture higher market valuations and lower vacancy rates? A Canadian case study of LEED and BOMA-BEST properties

Abstract

Purpose It is becoming increasingly clear that as the pressures of climate change increase around the world, all nations must strive to lower their carbon footprint through conservation. If the growth trend of green building and infrastructure construction is to be continued and improved upon, then evidence must be collected as to the benefits they bring about, and the level of support they enjoy in the market. The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the economic performance of green buildings by evaluating whether LEED for Homes and BOMA-BEST properties capture higher market valuations and lower vacancy rates. These types of research questions have not been investigated to a great deal in the Canadian context. The primary analysis concerning municipal market valuation of green buildings was conducted using robust ordinary least squares and logistic regression models. Commercial vacancy rates were compared through the use of χ2 tests. Our analysis did not lead to conclusive evidence that there exists a “green” premium in the real estate market with respect to municipal market valuations. The authors argue that this may largely be due to municipal appraisal methods that currently do not incorporate sustainability factors. As such, they may not adequately reflect market tastes and trends. Furthermore, while the vacancy rates of green commercial buildings were, on the whole, lower than their non-green counterparts, the differences were not statistically significant. Given these results, the authors propose a set of research activities that the academic community should pursue. Design/methodology/approach Statistical techniques are utilized test whether green certification (LEED/BOMA-BEST) leads to higher municipal valuation for both commercial and residential green properties, using regression analysis. Furthermore, χ2 tests are conducted to evaluate whether certification leads to lower vacancy rates for commercial properties. Findings In terms of valuation, certification does not exert (on average) a positive role in terms of higher valuations for both commercial and residential properties. However, with respect to vacancy rates, there is a tendency towards lower vacancy rates for green properties, but the relationship is not statistically significant. Research limitations/implications The next set of research needs to gather greater amount of data with respect to how municipal evaluations are performed since the results are counter-intuitive. Greater tracking of the financial performance of green buildings should be conducted and made available for both public and private bodies. Particularly, rental and sale prices of green buildings need to be tracked in an organized manner. Practical implications The valuation techniques utilized by the municipal authorities need revision as green properties are being assessed without appropriate guidance from educational institutions. Furthermore, the limited amount of “green” valuation techniques in existence may not be applied. Originality/value This is the first Canadian-based research looking into the valuation of green certification using rigorous quantitative statistical techniques and original and publicly available data. Furthermore, it holds important lessons for municipal authorities with respect to green building valuation beyond Canada as the limitations of current practice go mostly likely beyond the North American context.

Does the Literature Support a High Willingness to Pay for Green Label Buildings? An Answer with Treatment of Publication Bias

“…For instance, Mudgal et al (2013) report a negative green value (-10%) while Ramos et al (2016) measure a green premium of nearly 50%. At first sight, it might be thought that this heterogeneity is an artifact of the temporal or regional context, but this discrepancy persists when we observe results for the Unted States alone, with the study by Rahman (2014) supporting a small negative green value being a far cry from the 42% reported by . In this context, neither generalization nor synthesis are easy tasks, especially using the conventional narrative review.…”

Determinants of EVs adoption: a study on green behavior of consumers

“…Green marketing can be defined as a humanistic concept of marketing that embraces social as well as ecological elements and based the philosophy of minimizing environmental hazard (Crane, 2000;Peattie and Charter, 2003;Soonthonsmai, 2007). Green marketing comprises every single arranged action to create and encourage trades to fulfill human needs with the least possible effect on the ecology (Rahman et al, 2017). As green marketing is considered by numerous researchers to be one of the significant ideas in present-day business (McDaniel and Rylander, 1993;Kassaye, 2001;Kim and Choi, 2005), it is essential to comprehend to what degree the rise of this idea is influencing the behavior of consumers.…”

“…These changing habits and growing preferences of consumers for eco-friendly products have a significant effect on the corporate world too (Pavaskar, 2016;Manaktola and Jauhari, 2006). In place of this, not only the government but also the big corporate houses have now begun with initiatives on environmental issues in multiple numbers of ways by understanding the evolving needs of becoming green by adopting green behavior (Gardner and Stern, 2002;Rahman et al, 2017). Extensive dependence on fossil fuel-based vehicles as the primary mode for transport has raised serious environmental concerns (Agarwal, 2019).…”

Meta-Analysis of Price Premiums in Housing with Energy Performance Certificates (EPC)

“…However, in America, due to the greater number of labels, there is also a greater variability in the results, obtaining a range that is between −2.49% and 14.3%. The lowest values are those of [32,67,87], while the highest are [38,55,62,69]. To avoid this variability, it is recommended that mandatory labels be used in both America and Asia, as suggested by Fizaine et al [22].…”