2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do general practitioners overestimate the health of their patients with lower education?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results found by Kelly‐Irving et al . (), one may speculate that this would most likely lead to an underestimation of the concentration among the worse‐off. Concerning the results for obesity, it should be mentioned that self‐reported anthropometric data may involve some measurement or reporting errors, which are again likely to lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results found by Kelly‐Irving et al . (), one may speculate that this would most likely lead to an underestimation of the concentration among the worse‐off. Concerning the results for obesity, it should be mentioned that self‐reported anthropometric data may involve some measurement or reporting errors, which are again likely to lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease management, including better control of lifestyle risk factors and adherence to drug treatment, has been related to socioeconomic status, and in particular education levels. Moreover, it has been reported that patients with less formal education may be less likely to be properly diagnosed, and consequently less likely to receive adequate treatment, due to difficulties in communication between doctors and patients [ 8 , 9 ]. Social gradients in health and disease deserve further attention at the present moment given the global financial crisis that affects numerous people as well as the healthcare system as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy, social inequalities in mortality are widely reported but, as expected, they are generally smaller than in northern European countries,15 17 also as a consequence of small or inexistent social gradients in major lifestyle-related risk factors 18 19. Patterns of unhealthy behaviours,20 21 exposure to environmental hazards22–25 or stressful situations,24 26 early life experiences,27 access to/use of medical care,28 29 access to health information30 31 and to resources mediating the physiological consequences of stress (ie, social relationships and support, cultural capital)30 32 are among the factors potentially explaining social inequalities in mortality. On the one hand, between-country variations in the social patterning of these factors may account for the observed geographical differences in social inequalities in mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%