2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00056-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents' alcohol use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
116
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in most studies, peers were defined as either "the best friend" or a group of friends. Studies that relied on the best friend (Bot, et al, 2005;Branstetter, et al, 2011;De Kemp, Scholte, Overbeek, & Engels, 2006;Henry, Kobus, & Schoeny, 2011;Jackson, 1997;Larsen, et al, 2010;Rees & Pogarsky, 2010;Sieving, et al, 2000) did so because it was hypothesized that this friend usually shared a more intense and intimate relationship with the target and thus had a stronger influence (Rybak & McAndrew, 2006). However, there was little evidence supporting this hypothesis, with only a few studies showing that best friends had a strong influence on adolescents' alcohol use (Jackson, 1997;Urberg, et al, 1997), whereas other studies found only trivial or no effects (Bot, et al, 2005;Jaccard, et al, 2005;Larsen, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, in most studies, peers were defined as either "the best friend" or a group of friends. Studies that relied on the best friend (Bot, et al, 2005;Branstetter, et al, 2011;De Kemp, Scholte, Overbeek, & Engels, 2006;Henry, Kobus, & Schoeny, 2011;Jackson, 1997;Larsen, et al, 2010;Rees & Pogarsky, 2010;Sieving, et al, 2000) did so because it was hypothesized that this friend usually shared a more intense and intimate relationship with the target and thus had a stronger influence (Rybak & McAndrew, 2006). However, there was little evidence supporting this hypothesis, with only a few studies showing that best friends had a strong influence on adolescents' alcohol use (Jackson, 1997;Urberg, et al, 1997), whereas other studies found only trivial or no effects (Bot, et al, 2005;Jaccard, et al, 2005;Larsen, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second key issue in studies investigating peer association consists in asking the target adolescents questions about their friends' substance use (Cumsille, et al, 2000;Dick, et al, 2007;Epstein & Botvin, 2002;Fallu, et al, 2010;Ferguson & Meehan, 2011;Fergusson, et al, 2002;Fergusson, Woodward, & Horwood, 1999;Fite, Colder, & O'Connor, 2006;Guo, et al, 2002;Henry, et al, 2011;Henry, et al, 2005;Musher-Eizenman, et al, 2003;Nash et al, 2005;Patterson, Dishion, & Yoerger, 2000;Sieving, et al, 2000;Simons-Morton, 2004;Vitulano, Fite, & Rathert, 2009;Warr, 1993). This way of assessing peer behavior may reflect more a target adolescents' perceived norms about substance use than an objective measure of friends' actual substance use.…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In questo secondo filone rientrano i lavori di ricerca che hanno analizzato l'associazione tra uso di sostanze e proprietà delle reti sociali nella popolazione adolescente, riportando l'esistenza di un collegamento tra il contesto sociale in cui i giovani sono inseriti -in termini di natura della relazione con i membri della rete, presenza di un largo numero di persone che fanno uso di droga, influenza esercitata dal gruppo dei pari -e la maggiore probabilità di uso illecito di droghe [Donato et al, 1994;Meijer et al, 1994;Wang et al, 1997;Urberg et al, 1997;Friedman et al, 1997;Sieving et al, 2000;Mason et al, 2004Mason et al, , 2010Mennis & Mason, 2011].…”
Section: Un Excursus Degli Studi In Letteratura: Social Network E Counclassified
“…Many studies 4,8,9,[16][17][18][26][27][28] have found evidence that both processes are important for understanding peer similarities in alcohol use. Others have, however, found that peer influence is more important than peer selection 6,20,25 , which is somewhat contradictory to Knecht and colleagues 10 who found selection to play a relatively more significant role than social influence in predicting similarity between friends' alcohol use.…”
Section: Influence and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%