2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11129-007-9035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do frequency reward programs create switching costs? A dynamic structural analysis of demand in a reward program

Abstract: Switching costs, Reward programs, Dynamic programming, Discrete-choice, D40, L10, M31,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, empirical evidence implies that there are some significant switching costs only when lighter purchasers are close to earning a reward (Hartmann and Viard 2008). On the other hand, lighter buyers rarely purchase frequently enough to come close to receiving a reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, empirical evidence implies that there are some significant switching costs only when lighter purchasers are close to earning a reward (Hartmann and Viard 2008). On the other hand, lighter buyers rarely purchase frequently enough to come close to receiving a reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the proportion of late adopters who become loyal is small or nonexistent (Blattberg and Neslin 1990;Mela et al 1997). Possible explanations include inertia or variety-seeking behavior that results from low switching costs (Hartmann and Viard 2008).…”
Section: Grocery Loyalty Programs' Impact On Purchase Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further pointed out that customers possess different perceptions toward different loyalty-program characteristics and different levels. For example, customers place much greater value on a reward when they are closer to earning a reward, and they tend to place less value on a reward at the beginning of the program (Hartmann & Viard, 2008). In effect, as the value of accumulated spending increases and the expiration date for reward redemption approaches, customers are more likely to increase their purchases (Lewis, 2004).…”
Section: Perceived Program Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find mixed results, and are unable to conclude that loyalty programs have a substantial impact on repeat-purchase behavior. Hartmann and Viard (2008) tests whether a 'buy 10 get 1 free' rewards program creates switching costs for members. They examine a particular manifestation of switching costs by looking at whether customers accelerate their purchases as they move closer to achieving a reward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%