2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do fixers perform worse than non-fixers during global recessions and recoveries?

Abstract: There is an important debate about how economies with different exchange rate regimes performed during the Great Recession and its ensuing recovery. While economic theory suggests that economies with fixed exchange rates are more affected and recover more slowly from global shocks than economies with non-fixed exchange rates, the empirical evidence on the most recent global recession has been mixed. This paper examines the exchange rate and economic growth nexus and assesses how this relationship is affected b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second case, the conventional wisdom is that in the face of external shocks, the economies of flexible exchange rate countries improve quickly and robustly (Cerra & Saxena, 2008;Cerra et al, 2009;Hegarty & Wilson, 2017;Terrones, 2019). The flexible exchange rate functions as a shock absorber that automatically adjusts to mitigate the impact of the shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second case, the conventional wisdom is that in the face of external shocks, the economies of flexible exchange rate countries improve quickly and robustly (Cerra & Saxena, 2008;Cerra et al, 2009;Hegarty & Wilson, 2017;Terrones, 2019). The flexible exchange rate functions as a shock absorber that automatically adjusts to mitigate the impact of the shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in spite of this theoretical ambiguity empirical evidence finds that flexible exchange rate regimes tend to be more effective in stabilizing output (Hausmann and Gavin 1996;Levy-Yeyati and Sturzenegger 2003;Aizenman et al 2018). Flexible rate regimes can also help countries recover more quickly from commodity price shocks and global recessions than pegs (Roch 2019;Terrones 2020) and mitigate the transmission of global financial shocks to domestic financial markets (Obstfeld, Ostry, and Qureshi 2019). In this sense, flexible exchange rates can reduce output volatility and be an income-equalizing force during the recovery stage of the business cycle.…”
Section: Exchange Rate Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edwards and Levy Yeyati ( 2005) use 186 countries and do not have separate results for LICs. Terrones (2020) and Rose (2014) look at the impact of the global financial crisis in a sample of countries not exclusively devoted to LICs, and do not explaining differences in growth according to the level of development. Studies estimating the impact of changes in money or interest rates on real output in LICs rely mostly on estimating structural VARs (Mishra and Montiel, 2012).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%