Anglers spend large amounts of money on bait, equipment and licence fees (Salado & Vencovska, 2018) and so are economically invested in the fish resources that they utilise. This can be harnessed to fund aquatic ecosystem management (Arlinghaus et al., 2002). A good example of this is the US's Sport Fish Restoration Act (1950) [Dingell-Johnson Act], which taxes angling equipment to directly provide funds for fish stock conservation. Additionally, anglers are often a highly motivated group of stakeholders and possess considerable political power, for example in lobbying for better water quality (Bate, 2001). Since anglers often appreciate the value of natural surroundings and believe that biodiversity should be conserved (Dorow & Arlinghaus, 2012;Holland & Ditton, 1992), they are often willing to support aquatic conservation (Schuett et al., 2014;Williams et al., 2016) and comply with guidelines if it is in their interests to do so (Gray & Jordan, 2010;Nguyen et al., 2013).Anglers often consumptively use fish populations for food and/ or recreational pleasure (Duffus & Dearden, 1990), so it is unsurprising that anglers are frequently in conflict with other stakeholders (Arlinghaus et al., 2002). Anglers have been shown to have different perceptions and preferences regarding the management of aquatic