Do financial instruments or grants have a bigger effect on SMEs’ access to finance? Evidence from Hungary

Abstract

Purpose The economic situation in Europe is improving, nevertheless in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) entrepreneurs and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are still lacking in finances. In this situation, public funding can play an important role. Besides grants, the use of financial instruments (FIs) has become increasingly popular lately in CEE as well. This paper aims to examine the micro-level effects of the different financial tools to understand which type of finance could be most recommended for policymakers in relation to improving access to finance for SMEs, and thus achieving long-term, sustainable economic growth. Design/methodology/approach The database used is a panel with firm-years as the units of analysis, the variables contain firm-level characteristics, yearly aggregated information on European Union (EU) subsidies and yearly aggregated information on credits received by the firms. The analyses are done using propensity score matching. The ultimate goal is to show whether the EU funds – grants and FIs – have contributed to the development of the Hungarian post-communist economy at micro level or not. Findings The result shows that the use of subsidies has a positive impact on employment, sales and in certain settings on productivity. It is very important to notice, that grants seem to be used effectively. However, the results also show that the provision of the FI holds more direct relevance to advanced productivity. The conclusion is that FIs have more positive impact on the Hungarian economy. Originality/value At the time of the programming for the EU 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework, the paper presents original research in the field of access to finance showing evidence and evaluating the effect of using grants versus FIs, emphasiing differences between the two development tools. It is providing an invaluable insight to the policymaker for planning policy tools and use of funds in a most effective and efficient way.

Mapping SME productivity research: a systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda

“…Our review consequently includes studies focusing on Europe (excluding transition economies), the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. As such, empirical studies focusing on transition or developing economies (Abor et al 2014;De Loecker 2007;Kim and Ro 2017;Nyikos et al 2020;Ur Rehman et al 2019), or those primarily focused on other aspects like SMEs efficiency, performance or competitiveness (Hamilton and Asundi 2010;Hogan and Coote 2014;Ipinnaiye et al 2017;Siqueira and Cosh 2008), are considered outside the scope of this review. While the focus on western economies restricts our understanding of SME productivity to this specific context, the exclusion of other geographical regions was deemed necessary to ensure greater homogeneity, and allow us to take into consideration the effects of macro-level factors on SME productivity (Ostapenko 2015;Rangamohan et al 2007).…”

UK government-backed start-up loans: Tackling disadvantage and credit rationing of new entrepreneurs

“…Lack of financial resources is still considered one of the most common barriers to individuals willing to become entrepreneurs (Kersten et al, 2017). To overcome this constraint, many governments started offering financial instruments, such as soft loans, that is, with subsidised/reduced interest rates (Grimm and Paffhausen, 2015; Nyikos et al, 2020) and partial or full-credit guarantees for loans as a part of loan guarantee schemes (Cowling, 2010; Gai et al, 2016; Lagazio et al, 2021; Martín-García and Morán Santor, 2021). Generally, the mechanism of change assumes that the borrowed public resources (or those allocated for guarantees in the case of loan defaults) will return back to the economy in the form of enhanced competitiveness of the supported businesses and newly created job opportunities, contributing thus to the overall regional economic development (Dvouletý et al, 2019; Kersten et al, 2017).…”

Fostering Entrepreneurial Ecosystems through the Stimulation and Mentorship of New Entrepreneurs

“…Good credit history and stable financial indicators are demanded by commercial banks to offer loans to companies, and these demands cannot be satisfied by newly established firms [38]. When traditional financing resources, such as loans, overdrafts, or credit lines, are not available, an alternative solution for entrepreneurs to get the necessary funding to start a business is non-traditional financing, such as non-reimbursable grants [37,39].…”