2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00288.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Family Firms Provide More or Less Voluntary Disclosure?

Abstract: We examine the voluntary disclosure practices of family firms. We find that, compared to nonfamily firms, family firms provide fewer earnings forecasts and conference calls, but more earnings warnings. Whereas the former is consistent with family owners having a longer investment horizon, better monitoring of management, and lower information asymmetry between owners and managers, the higher likelihood of earnings warnings is consistent with family owners having greater litigation and reputation cost concerns.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
296
2
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
28
296
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…this indicates that the accounting indicators (EPS and OCF) are more sensitive, directly related to financial survivability and reflect the evaluation of performance (Sun & Tong 2003) as compared to the market indicator (tobin's Q). the findings are consistent with previous studies (Chen et al 2008;Chen & Nowland 2010). With large boards, family firms have more resources, wider external relationship, higher problem solving capabilities and diversity in the .045** .431*** .085*** 1 ** significant at 0.05 (2 tailed), ***significant at 0.01 (2 tailed).…”
Section: Multivariate Regressionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…this indicates that the accounting indicators (EPS and OCF) are more sensitive, directly related to financial survivability and reflect the evaluation of performance (Sun & Tong 2003) as compared to the market indicator (tobin's Q). the findings are consistent with previous studies (Chen et al 2008;Chen & Nowland 2010). With large boards, family firms have more resources, wider external relationship, higher problem solving capabilities and diversity in the .045** .431*** .085*** 1 ** significant at 0.05 (2 tailed), ***significant at 0.01 (2 tailed).…”
Section: Multivariate Regressionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Larger boards mean that there are more ideas and skills that can be shared among board members. However, studies have found that family companies have slightly smaller boards and lower board independence than non-family firms (Chen, Chen & Cheng 2008). The smaller board size may be due to a trade-off between growth and risk exposure faced by the firms.…”
Section: Board Composition and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2008) find that family owners on average prefer less voluntary disclosure. Donnelly and Mulcahey (2008) examine the association between corporate governance and corporate disclosure by using a disclosure index based on Eng and Mark (2003); the results show that there is a positive relationship between non executive directors and the greater the level corporate voluntary disclosure.…”
Section: Studies In 2008mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…35% of the Standard and Poor (S&P) 500 Industrials as well as 46% of S&P 1500 were family owned businesses [Anderson and Reeb, 2003;Chen et al, 2007]. In Germany, almost a half of all listed companies were family owned, excluding companies from financial sector [Achleitner et al, 2009], while in Spain it was almost 40% [Zulfiqar i Fayyaz 2014].…”
Section: Family Firms Definition and Role In Capital Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%