2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do estrogen, progesterone, P53 and Ki67 receptor ratios determined from curettage materials in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma predict lymph node metastasis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,22,23 What's more, the combination of ER, PR, Ki67, and P53 had been demonstrated a statistically significant predictor for lymph node involvement in EC. 15 In this study, each ratio will correspond to a sensitivity and specificity, and we find the optimal cutoff value of the combined ratio ([ER + PR]/[P53 + Ki67]) by Youden…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,22,23 What's more, the combination of ER, PR, Ki67, and P53 had been demonstrated a statistically significant predictor for lymph node involvement in EC. 15 In this study, each ratio will correspond to a sensitivity and specificity, and we find the optimal cutoff value of the combined ratio ([ER + PR]/[P53 + Ki67]) by Youden…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in clinical practice, it is lack of effectiveness and accuracy to predict the recurrence simply based on the expression of a single biomarker rather than the combined value of ER, PR, Ki67, and P53. What's more, as shown in the study on lymph node involvement of EC, the combined ratio of ([ER + PR]/[P53 + Ki67]) had been demonstrated a more statistically significant predictor than the expression of a single indicator 15 . In addition, as for EC recurrence, it is lack of research on the combined ratio of immunohistochemical markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Immunohistochemical markers have been widely applied in pathological reports, and have already became an important indicator for prognosis in EC and other tumors. 6,7 In breast cancer, the prognostic prediction value has been optimized by adding four immunohistochemical markers -ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 -to the traditional model.. 8 Therefore, it is of great necessity to incorporate immunohistochemical markers into the traditional models and develop a more precise prediction model for recurrence in EC to facilitate individualized treatment for patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noticed that in some studies, the absence of ER/PR expression was also an independent predictor of poor prognosis in type II endometrial cancer. [5][6][7] Although there is a lot of literature to support that hormone receptor expression is associated with prognosis, no accepted clinical guidelines to report the role of hormone receptor status in the prognosis of endometrial cancer, but estrogen-progesterone receptors appear to be promising prognostic biomarkers in the future. 8,9 In breast cancer, ESR1 and PGR gene polymorphism was found to be related to the ER/PR expression and prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%