2020
DOI: 10.5380/dma.v55i0.73864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do enfrentamento à convivência: o Fórum Seca como movimento político

Abstract: O presente artigo busca refletir sobre o paradigma da convivência com o semiárido a partir dos seus antecedentes históricos, evidenciados pelo Fórum Pernambucano de Enfrentamento à Problemática da Seca – Fórum Seca (1989-1996), enquanto projeto político mobilizatório anunciador de caminhos de resistência e luta. O Fórum Seca torna-se referência obrigatória na problematização da seca, sob a égide da discussão política, em ocasião do Ato Público de ocupação da Superintendência do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste – SU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter, in our research, is different: civil society involvement pushed the cope-with-drought paradigm onto the political agenda (Costa et al 2013;Pereira 2016). Prior studies have noted the importance of the emergence of the cope-with-drought paradigm as a bottom-up governance strategy led by civil society (Machado and Rovere 2017), which influenced political debate through civil society and academic forums such as the Drought Forum (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996) (Sieber and Gomes 2020) and the COP3 (da Silva 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, in our research, is different: civil society involvement pushed the cope-with-drought paradigm onto the political agenda (Costa et al 2013;Pereira 2016). Prior studies have noted the importance of the emergence of the cope-with-drought paradigm as a bottom-up governance strategy led by civil society (Machado and Rovere 2017), which influenced political debate through civil society and academic forums such as the Drought Forum (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996) (Sieber and Gomes 2020) and the COP3 (da Silva 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%