2014
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Customers Affect the Value Relevance of Sustainability Reporting? Empirical Evidence on Stakeholder Interdependence

Abstract: In spite of the strategic importance of sustainability reporting in current business practice and the resulting increase in research on its value relevance, studies accounting for stakeholder interdependence are scarce. On the basis of the instrumental stakeholder theory, we investigate whether customers have an impact on the value relevance of sustainability reporting. Using a sample of US listed firms, we show that the value relevance of sustainability reporting is affected by customer profile differences, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
4
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these findings suggest that reliability and relevancy of financial reporting are the key elements for stakeholders in their decision making process. These findings are consistent with Gaio and Raposo (2014); Goettsche, Steindl, and Gietl (2014). Financial reporting of higher quality helps to reduce litigations against the firms and improves the investment efficiency, and avoids the over-investment (Lara, Osma, and Penalva, 2016).…”
Section: Combined Effect Of Corporate Governance and Earnings Qualitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, these findings suggest that reliability and relevancy of financial reporting are the key elements for stakeholders in their decision making process. These findings are consistent with Gaio and Raposo (2014); Goettsche, Steindl, and Gietl (2014). Financial reporting of higher quality helps to reduce litigations against the firms and improves the investment efficiency, and avoids the over-investment (Lara, Osma, and Penalva, 2016).…”
Section: Combined Effect Of Corporate Governance and Earnings Qualitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By examining the relationship between ESG disclosure and financial performance, various studies provide empirical support for the notion that sustainability disclosure is (partially) value relevant (Guidry and Patten, 2010;Schadewitz and Niskala, 2010;Berthelot et al, 2012;Dhaliwal et al, 2012;Clarkson et al, 2013;Zuraida et al, 2014;Cahan et al, 2015;de Villiers and Marques, 2016;Goettsche et al, 2016;Kaspereit and Lopatta, 2016;Qiu et al, 2016). However, despite the important role of ESG disclosures (Rikhardsson and Holm, 2008;Elliott et al, 2014), the question of how the readers are affected by the reports and how they perceive them has mostly been neglected (Fifka, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the 1990s, this type of investment has evolved towards the use of positive screening criteria. This meant considering, within the portfolio selection and management process, good practices of listed companies and investing in companies commonly called "best-in-class" [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%