2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11293-010-9254-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Credit Cards Really Reduce Aggregate Money Holdings?

Abstract: Aggregate money holdings, Credit card, E40, E41,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 8, the volume of credit card transactions (CCVOLCARD) is negatively related to currency demand (CURSAV) in the long run. This is consistent with the previous findings, such as those by Duca and Whitesell (1995), and differs from the findings of Yang and King (2011). The main difference between Yang and King (2011) and this study is the distinctive economic and banking structures in this article’s sample.…”
Section: Estimation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 8, the volume of credit card transactions (CCVOLCARD) is negatively related to currency demand (CURSAV) in the long run. This is consistent with the previous findings, such as those by Duca and Whitesell (1995), and differs from the findings of Yang and King (2011). The main difference between Yang and King (2011) and this study is the distinctive economic and banking structures in this article’s sample.…”
Section: Estimation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the previous findings, such as those by Duca and Whitesell (1995), and differs from the findings of Yang and King (2011). The main difference between Yang and King (2011) and this study is the distinctive economic and banking structures in this article’s sample. Yang and King (2011) take their samples from the US economy which has a strong cheque culture whereas this study’s sample is a cash-based economy.…”
Section: Estimation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations