Do Countries Matter? Explaining the Variation in the Use of Numerical Flexibility Arrangements Across European Companies Using a Multi-Level Model

Abstract

Do countries matter, especially compared to other aspects that affect the flexibility behaviours of companies? Many studies on the labour market assume that there are country differences, cross-national variances, and that it is a crucial factor in explaining the actual practices of the labour market by individuals and companies. The supposition is that although there are variations across countries, the behaviour of actors within the country is rather homogenous. Thus, due to country level characteristics, the actors within the country are seen to act similarly. This is due to the fact that individuals and individual companies are restricted within the country due to their institutional frame, cultural and social boundaries. However, this does not necessarily mean that actors are completely restricted within these boundaries. This becomes more evident when we are dealing with labour market flexibility options, for this can be developed (in companies or perhaps by individuals) as a coping mechanism to overcome the restrictions of society. This paper asks the questions, do countries matter, and to what extent it does matter and how it matters. It addresses this issue by first comparing the variance of each level under examination, that is, the country, sector and company level, through the use of a multi-level random effects model. The examination of the variance of each level will allow us to see to which extent countries matter. Also this model allows us to see how factors that explain the flexibility behaviours of companies show different effects across countries to answer the question how countries matter in an exploratory manner. The issue of flexibility is addressed uniquely in this paper in two aspects. Unlike many of the previous studies on this issue, this paper uses a broader definition of flexibility, thus, it perceives labour market flexibility as a method used for the needs of workers as well as those of employers or companies. In other words, as companies facilitate their adaptation to business cycles through labour market flexibility, workers adapt to life cycles through it. Based on this definition, flexibility practices used within companies can be measured two dimensionally, on one side its overall level and another to whom it is (more) geared towards. Also, unlike studies that focus on one or few specific arrangements, this paper does not examine various flexibility options as separate entities. It examines the practices as a whole, i.e. the use and the combination of various arrangements in achieving numerical flexibility. The data used here is the European Survey of Working-Time and Work-life Balance (ESWT) from the European Foundation of the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. This survey covers 21000 establishments in 21 EU member states for the years 2004/2005. The outcomes of this study show that being within a certain country is indeed an important factor in explaining the differences between companies in taking up flexibility options. However, the variance between comp...

Inclusive workplaces and older employees: an analysis of companies' investment in retaining senior workers

“…Studier viser da at også arbeidsmarkedssituasjonen og rekrutteringssituasjonen har betydning (Chung, 2007;Chung, Kerkhofs, & Ester, 2007;Hutchens & Grace-Martin, 2006;Jensen & Møberg, 2012;Leber & Wagner, 2007;Midtsundstad, , 2011Tros, 2010;, 2010a. Tilbud om seniortiltak påvirkes av konjunkturendringer; «the business-cycle hypothesis».…”

Fragmentation of employment relationships, fragmentation of working time: the nature of work and employment of platform takeaway riders and implications for decent work in China

“…In particular, institutions (e.g. labour regulation and trade unions) and market structures and situations are ‘important in explaining the practices of working time flexibility’ (Chung 2008, 38), as well as the distinct characteristics of the national labour market systems and outcomes more generally (Le et al. 2021).…”

The Diffusion of Employment Flexibility in Nigeria’s Banking Industry: Its Nature, Extent and Causes

“…In highly regulated employment systems like Norway, they argue, organizations have less managerial autonomy as they must ensure compliance with rigid employment laws. Supporting this view, Chung (2007) argues that in Europe, the national institutional arrangements play a significant role in the determination of the nature and level of utilization of flexible employment practices. Also, Horwitz et al (2000: 83) conclude in their comparative study of South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, that: "the more voluntarist the industrial relations system, the more employers are able to make strategic choices regarding flexible and other innovative work practices".…”