Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?

Abstract

BackgroundConsumers have the right to inquire whether a consumer article contains substances of very high concern (‘SVHC right to know’). This communication tool is designed to stimulate suppliers to substitute such ingredients. A survey among 1321 consumers with high motivation and interest in harmful substances in everyday products was conducted to understand the acceptance of this ‘right to know’ among consumers.ResultsOnly one out of seven survey participants stated to be well informed about the ‘SVHC right to know’ with nearly all of them having good self-reported chemical knowledge. Three quarters of the participants who are not working with chemicals or REACH at their workplace have never heard about the ‘SVHC right to know’. Every second participant declared their interest to search for more information about an SVHC in a certain article, but, in fact, not more than 4% of all participants inquired for SVHCs with various methods. Only 1% would buy an SVHC-containing article with no strings attached. While detailed comments by some survey participants showed a high level of understanding of the issue, many respondents were not sure what the SVHC information means for their daily life. They declared that they would inform themselves, reduce the use of the article with SVHCs, circulate this information, or throw such an article into the garbage. Most study participants suggested improvements of the ‘SVHC right to know’. The preferred suggestions were a ban of SVHCs, easily understandable information on the packaging, full ingredient declaration on the articles, or no need to inquire for every single item, while smartphone applications for SVHC requests were the least popular suggestion in all age groups.ConclusionsVarious reasons could be identified why most consumers—even these motivated and interested ones—do not use the ‘SVHC right to know’. This allowed developing recommendations for improving the effectiveness of this communication instrument on the way to the gradual elimination of SVHCs in consumer articles.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Breathing life into consumer rights: smartphone tools facilitating the “right to know” on substances of very high concern in REACH articles

“…Which kind of information is best suited in the context of toxic chemicals is a promising avenue for future research. Initial evidence from survey research suggests that simple binary information signals (contains SVHCs above threshold or not) lead, as expected, to extreme behavioural intentions [51]. Depending on the results of future research, a revised version of Art.…”

Sodium Benzoate—Harmfulness and Potential Use in Therapies for Disorders Related to the Nervous System: A Review

“…Due to the advancing chemicalization of food in recent years, an increasing number of consumers have declared their interest in such food features as sensation, health, and, above all, safety [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. For fear of the adverse effects of chemicals added to food in order to improve its taste and appearance or extend its shelf life, the choice of the least-processed products that do not contain additives, including preservatives, has become more and more popular, thus creating the trend of the so-called “clean label”.…”