2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjar.2021.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do common owners influence corporate social responsibility? Firm-level evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samet et al (2018) find that there is a negative relationship between CSR and financial constraints, and this alleviation effect is attributed by mitigation of agency conflict of free cash flow and information asymmetry. Yan (2021) shows that co-owned enterprises can benefit by easing financial constraints when they increase socially responsible investments. Ma et al (2023) conclude that after pollution emergency, firms choose to increase CSR to gain reputation and further ease financial constraints.…”
Section: Impact Of Csr On Financing Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samet et al (2018) find that there is a negative relationship between CSR and financial constraints, and this alleviation effect is attributed by mitigation of agency conflict of free cash flow and information asymmetry. Yan (2021) shows that co-owned enterprises can benefit by easing financial constraints when they increase socially responsible investments. Ma et al (2023) conclude that after pollution emergency, firms choose to increase CSR to gain reputation and further ease financial constraints.…”
Section: Impact Of Csr On Financing Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in terms of economic benefits, socially responsible firms can earn more wealth for investors through reputation and competitive advantages (Petersen & Vredenburg, 2009). Therefore, to achieve the goal of maximizing portfolio value, common institutional ownership will use governance advantages to motivate firms to engage in green innovation and actively fulfill their social responsibility (Jiang & Bai, 2022; Yan, 2021), and it may even take their green innovation level as one of the reference criteria for reducing its holdings. In this case, when common institutional ownership sells stocks based on private information or liquidity demand, it often takes the lead in selling firms lagging in green innovation.…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to avoid the negative impact of stock selling, firms will actively cater to the preferences of common institutional ownership. For example, Yan (2021) found that "voting with feet" through common institutional ownership can motivate firms to increase their socially responsible investments. Overall, according to rivalry-based imitation, under the dual background that common institutional ownership attaches importance to green innovation and the deterrent effect of their "voting with feet," firms will consciously pay attention to their own green innovation as well as those of their peers.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has attracted the attention of many sports and non-sports organizations and has become one of the main concerns of sports organizations (Trendafiova et al ., 2017; Zeimers et al ., 2019, 2021). CSR has become essential to corporate strategic management and it is an accepted and growing practice that CSR was able to maintain an enhanced competitive advantage (Yan, 2021; Jones et al ., 2018). CSR refers to the voluntary involvement of businesses in social, environmental, ethical and human rights issues as part of their activities and business relationships with their stakeholders (Nguyen et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%