Do Children With Autism Re‐Enact Object Movements Rather Than Imitate Demonstrator Actions?

Abstract

It has been suggested that autism-specific imitative deficits may be reduced or even spared in object-related activities. However, most previous research has not sufficiently distinguished object movement reenactment (learning about the ways in which object move) from imitation (learning about the topography of demonstrated actions). Twenty children with autism (CWA) and 20 typically developing children (TDC) were presented with puzzle boxes containing prizes. Test objects and experimental conditions were designed to isolate object- and action-related aspects of demonstrations. There were four types of video demonstrations: (a) a full demonstration by an adult; (b) a ghost demonstration with object movements alone; (c) mimed solutions demonstrated adjacent to the objects; and (d) random actions performed on the surface of the objects. There were no significant between-group differences in the degree to which CWA and TDC matched the full demonstrations, the actual demonstrations or in their times to first solution in any of the conditions. Although there was no clear imitative deficit in the CWA, regression analyses were conducted to explore in more detail whether diagnosis, verbal intelligence quotient (VIQ), nonverbal IQ NVIQ, age or motor coordination predicted performance. The results are discussed in relation to the use of extrinsic vs. intrinsic rewards and the interplay between motor coordination and the relative rigidity vs. pliability of objects.

Social Functions in Autistic Children and Interaction with/through Object: A Brief Report

“…Concerning imitation, it has been suggested that the specific imitation deficit of autism could be reduced or even eliminated with the use of activities linked to objects (Vanvuchelen et al, 2013;Custance et al, 2014), especially when no timelines in the use of objects are given. This would favour a higher joint attention, motor imitation and intentional communication with a social partner (Swettenham et al, 1998).…”

Development and application of an electrical buzz wire to evaluate eye-hand coordination and object control skill in children: a feasibility study

“…In this way, an electrical buzz wire (EBW) was built as an attractive therapeutic tool. Some authors have demonstrated the use of EBW to assess children's facial expression during errors [8], manual dexterity training [9], and attentional and neuropsychiatric deficits [10], but none investigated the accuracy and precision during eye-hand coordination and object control skill assessment in children.…”

Object Use in Children with Autism: Building with Blocks from a Piagetian Perspective

“…Williams et al (2005) interviewed parents of 10 children with autism (MA = 62.2 months; SD = 19.9) who reported problems relating to the use of an object, such as an interest in some unusual aspect of the object, an unusual way of using the object, or difficulty in generalizing object use. Custance et al (2014) suggested that imitative deficits in children with autism can be reduced by means of object-related activities, especially if there are no time limits on use of the object. Object-related activities promote joint attention, motor imitation, and intentional communication with a social partner (Bruckner and Yoder, 2007), and there is evidence that interventions focused on play involving different objects can promote social and imitative behaviors (Brown and Murray, 2001;Stahmer et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2017).…”