2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Ceramic Femoral Heads Reduce Taper Fretting Corrosion in Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrieval Study

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious studies regarding modular head-neck taper corrosion were largely based on cobalt chrome (CoCr) alloy femoral heads. Less is known about head-neck taper corrosion with ceramic femoral heads.Questions/purposesWe asked (1) whether ceramic heads resulted in less taper corrosion than CoCr heads; (2) what device and patient factors influence taper fretting corrosion; and (3) whether the mechanism of taper fretting corrosion in ceramic heads differs from that in CoCr heads.MethodsOne hundred femora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
133
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
133
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One clinical study of metal-on-polyethylene failure has identified a tendency for cobalt levels to increase preferentially to chromium levels when corrosion is a cause of failure [6]. Another study has demonstrated that corrosion is lower with a ceramic to metal taper junction than a metal to metal taper junction [13]. We speculate that lower bearing surface wear and less corrosion may contribute to the stable and comparatively low variability of the CoM cobalt levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One clinical study of metal-on-polyethylene failure has identified a tendency for cobalt levels to increase preferentially to chromium levels when corrosion is a cause of failure [6]. Another study has demonstrated that corrosion is lower with a ceramic to metal taper junction than a metal to metal taper junction [13]. We speculate that lower bearing surface wear and less corrosion may contribute to the stable and comparatively low variability of the CoM cobalt levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A final benefit of this bearing surface is the ceramic head interface with the femoral stem. Retrieval studies have demonstrated lower corrosion at the Morse taper when ceramic heads were used compared with metal heads [13]. The primary concern with a CoM bearing is the metal debris generated at the bearing surface and the potential biologic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) What is the effect of factors affecting the frictional forces between the femoral head and the acetabular liner, including surface roughness (third-body damage), clearance of the articulation, and the viscosity of the joint fluid [2]? (5) As most of the material loss in modular joints come from tribo-corrosion of the CoCr head, should metal heads be replaced by ceramic or ''ceramicized'' heads to minimize the problem [7]? Or perhaps surface treatments (ion implantation, nitride, or diamond-like coatings) are a solution.…”
Section: Corr Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on this topic have examined relatively small numbers of implants (50 to 80), with conflicting conclusions both in favor [4,7] and against [5] an association between larger heads and increased fretting and/or corrosion of modular head-neck junctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hips, increased corrosion has been shown in 36-mm metal femoral heads compared with 28-mm heads [16]. Another contributing factor to tribocorrosion in MoP and MoM THAs is the dissimilar alloy pairings of a cobalt-chrome femoral head taper and a titanium trunnion [26], and ceramic femoral heads have been shown to decrease taper tribocorrosion compared with cobalt-chrome heads (CoCr) [20,25,31].…”
Section: What Clinical Problems Have Been Reported In Patients With Mmentioning
confidence: 99%