2020
DOI: 10.1177/2378023119898326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Carbon Prices Limit Economic Growth?

Abstract: The most common counterargument to taxing carbon emissions is that the policy has a negative impact on economic growth. The author tests the validity of this argument by visualizing the enactment of carbon prices on gross domestic product per capita from 1979 to 2018 and presenting a formal fixed-effects regression analysis of panel data. No connection is found between carbon price implementation and diminished economic growth. This outcome is primarily due to policy design and the general nature of economic g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, carbon prices (taxing emissions) are the favored policy instrument of experts (Cramton et al 2017; Nordhaus 1994; Sandbu 2020) and are the primary policy recommendation from the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Rogelj et al 2018). Furthermore, their adoption does not limit economic growth, a common conservative critique (Driscoll 2020), suggesting that their implementation offers a smoother decoupling of emissions from economic growth. Thus, the policy is effective, is approved by experts, and does not limit national prosperity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, carbon prices (taxing emissions) are the favored policy instrument of experts (Cramton et al 2017; Nordhaus 1994; Sandbu 2020) and are the primary policy recommendation from the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Rogelj et al 2018). Furthermore, their adoption does not limit economic growth, a common conservative critique (Driscoll 2020), suggesting that their implementation offers a smoother decoupling of emissions from economic growth. Thus, the policy is effective, is approved by experts, and does not limit national prosperity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the issue of climate change and carbon pricing create additional restrictions and exacerbate problems in developing countries' energy sectors. Its application has the potential to eliminate a product's competitiveness and decrease the gross domestic product (Diamond and Zodrow, 2018;Driscoll, 2020). At the same time, technologies to improve energy efficiency across all sectors can help moderate energy demand growth.…”
Section: Energy Intensity As Decarbonized Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Switzerland, a proposal of an increased carbon tax and the introduction of an aviation tickets tax were narrowly rejected by 51.6% of voters in June 2021 -a proposal which would have helped cut Swiss emissions in half by 2030 as compared to 1990 levels. The proposal would have increased the maximum carbon tax rate from CHF 120/tCO2 (EUR 110/tCO2) in 2022 to CHF 210/tCO2 (EUR 195/tCO2) until 2030, resulting in the increase of the tax if the emissions reduction target was not reached (Carbon Pulse, 2021 [233]). In Mexico, the government's introduction of gazolinazo in 2017a 20% increase in fuel prices -led to citizen protests and blocked streets (The Guardian, 2017 [234]).…”
Section: Enhanced Public Support For Climate Action and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%