1994
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/7.3.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Bulls and Bears Move Across Borders? International Transmission of Stock Returns and Volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
418
3
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 755 publications
(449 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
14
418
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study showed price movements in the U.S. stock market greatly impacted the next day performance of the Japanese stock market; however, the Japanese equity market only had a small influence on the U.S. market. Previous studies conducted by Odier and Solnik (1993), Lin, Engle, andIto (1994), andCampbell, Koedijk, andKofman (2002) also showed evidence that markets are correlated at the international level and especially vulnerable to U.S. market declines. Our finding supports their work but also helps explain the unilateral relationship in the influence (only U.S. to Japan) between the two countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Their study showed price movements in the U.S. stock market greatly impacted the next day performance of the Japanese stock market; however, the Japanese equity market only had a small influence on the U.S. market. Previous studies conducted by Odier and Solnik (1993), Lin, Engle, andIto (1994), andCampbell, Koedijk, andKofman (2002) also showed evidence that markets are correlated at the international level and especially vulnerable to U.S. market declines. Our finding supports their work but also helps explain the unilateral relationship in the influence (only U.S. to Japan) between the two countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A significant number of studies examined the spillovers effect among markets and provided a new perspective on the degree of such transmission. In this regard, studies that examine the spillover of volatility among developed markets (Hamao et al, 1990;Bae & Karolyi, 1994;Karolyi, 1995;Susmel & Engle, 1994;Koutmos & Booth, 1995;Lin et al, 1994;Kanas, 1998) and in the emerging and frontier markets (Choudhry, 1996;Bekaert & Harvey, 1997;Scheicher, 2001;Malik & Hammoudeh, 2007;Hammoudeh & Li, 2008;Li & Majerowska, 2008;Beirne et al, 2010;Gilenko & Fedorova, 2014) provides important insight in the explanation of volatility transmission across markets. Ng (2000) explore the spillover dissemination between US, Japan and various Pacific-Basin markets, and find evidence of volatility spillover from US and Japan to various Pacific-Basin markets.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies employ generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) models to explore whether news and shocks originate from the rest of the world may influence local emerging markets (Lin, Engle, & Ito, 1994;Choudhry, 1996;Bekaert & Harvey, 1997;Kanas, 1998;Ng, 2000;Baele, 2005;Chiang, Chen, & Lin, 2013). R. F. Engle, Ito, and Lin (1990) and Hamao, Masulis, and Ng (1990) are among the prior studies to use univariate GARCH model to analyze the volatility spillover effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal work of Grubel (1968) on the benefits of international portfolio diversification (see also, Levy and Sarnat (1979) and Agmon (1972)), this topic has received special attention in international finance. In fact, a growing body of literature has emerged more recently on studying comovements of international stock market returns (see, King et al (1994), Lin et al (1994), Longin and Solnik (2001), Karolyi and Stulz (1996), Forbes and Rigobon (2002), Brooks and Del Negro (2006), Okimoto (2008), among others). In particular, many of these studies present empirical evidence suggesting an asymmetric pattern in comovements of international stock market returns, in the sense that stock returns show stronger comovements when they go down than when they go up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%