Do Board Characteristics Affect Bank Performance? Evidence from the Eurozone

Bouteska, Ahmed

doi:10.1057/s41260-020-00181-2

Cited by 19 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This measure shows the relationship of financial performance with the number of board meetings held. Earlier Researchers experienced a positive significant relationship of number of board meetings held with ROA (Fariha, Hossain & Ghosh, 2021;Bouteska 2020). In contrast Almoneef & Samontaray (2019), proved a negative relationship between board meetings and ROA.…”

Section: Board Meeting and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 95%

“…Studies show a negative and significance relationship of board independence with firm performance (return on assets and Tobin's Q) (Fariha, Hossain & Ghosh, 2021;Pathan & Faff, 2021). On the other hand, Osman & Samontaray (2022); Amedi & Mustafa, (2020); Bouteska (2020), in their respective studies accepted the hypothesis of positive significant relationship between board independence and firm performance. In other research studies, researchers could not find any significant association of board independence with the firm performance (Ganguli & Guha Deb, 2021;Bajeher, 2019;Dalton & Dalton, 2011;Bhagat & Black 2001).…”

Section: Board Size and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 97%

“…Researchers in previous studies argued a larger board creates coordination problem (Jensen, 1993;Mustafa et al, 2017) and found a negative relationship between board size and firm performance (Amedi & Mustafa, 2020;Yeh & Trejos, 2015;Pathan & Faff, 2013;Ujunwa, 2012;Guest, 2009). On the contrary, there are research studies which conclude larger board size is more effective and there lies significant positive relationship between board size and firm performance (Neralla, 2022;Osman & Samontaray, 2022;Ganguli & Guha Deb, 2021;Bouteska, 2020;Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019). In contrast Bajeher, (2019) reveals that board size has no significant impact on firm performance.…”

Section: Board Size and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dependent variables selected for the current study are return on asset and Tobin's Q (Fariha, Hossain & Ghosh, 2021;Bouteska 2020, Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019. The four independent variables selected are board size (Jensen, 1993;Mustafa et al, 2017;Amedi & Mustafa, 2020;Yeh & Trejos, 2015;Pathan & Faff, 2013;Ujunwa, 2012;Guest, 2009;Neralla, 2022;Osman & Samontaray, 2022;Ganguli & Guha Deb, 2021;Bouteska, 2020;Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019;Bajeher, 2019), board independence (Fariha, Hossain & Ghosh, 2021;Pathan & Faff, 2021, Ganguli & Guha Deb, 2021Bajeher, 2019;Dalton & Dalton, 2011;Bhagat & Black 2001), board meeting (Fariha, Hossain & Ghosh, 2021;Bouteska 2020;Bajeher, 2019;Naseem et al, 2017;Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019) and number of board committees (Klein, 1998;Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019). Firm age and firm size are introduced as the control variables (Almoneef & Samontaray, 2019).…”

Section: Variables Selectedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Do the Board Characteristics influence the Firm Performance? An Experience with the Capital-Intensive Industries Listed in the Saudi Stock Exchange (TADAWUL)

AlSaif¹,

AlRuwaishd²,

Samontaray³

2022

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the researchers in this article is to explore the relationship of board characteristics (board size, board meeting, number of board committees, board independence) on the firm performance (ROA & Tobin’s Q) in Saudi Capital-Intensive Industries for the data period of 2017-2020. Many researchers have tried to measure this relationship in earlier research papers, but the Capital-Intensive Industries have not been exclusively tested so far. This paper aims at filling this gap and measure the relationship of exclusive board characteristics and firm performance Capital Intensive Industries listed in Saudi Stock Exchange (TADAWUL). We find board size influences the firm performance in an opposite direction. On the other hand, board meeting influences the firm performance in a positive direction and both the results are statistically significant. The other board characteristics are not influencing the firm performance in this study. Additionally, the firm size is influencing the firm performance (positively with ROA and negatively with Tobin’s Q).

show abstract

Section: Board Meeting and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Board Size and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Board Size and Firm Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Variables Selectedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Do the Board Characteristics influence the Firm Performance? An Experience with the Capital-Intensive Industries Listed in the Saudi Stock Exchange (TADAWUL)

AlSaif¹,

AlRuwaishd²,

Samontaray³

2022

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Frekuensi rapat merupakan suatu indikasi bagaimana kualitas komitmen dewan komisaris. Ada berbagai hal yang dibicarakan dalam agenda rapat dewan, sehingga berpotensi menurunkan risiko perusahaan (Aslam & Haron, 2021), monitoring keputusan strategis (Karamanou & Vafeas, 2005), meningkatkan kinerja keuangan (Bouteska, 2020;Fariha et al, 2021). Banyaknya agenda pertemuan memungkinkan manajemen memiliki kesempatan konsultasi lebih banyak.…”

Section: Frekuensi Rapat Dewan Komisarisunclassified

Mekanisme Pemantauan Yang Efektif Dalam Kondisi Financial Distress

Wijaya¹,

Hermanda²

2022

Jur. Eko. Man. Akt Islam

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to explain how effective the monitoring mechanism works in conditions of financial distress. Two types of monitoring mechanisms were explored in the study namely: corporate governance and ownership monitoring mechanisms. This study uses 294 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 3 years. This study uses binary logistic regression to analyze the empirical data. The results of the data processing show that only the size of the board of commissioners and gender diversification can help companies deal with economic downturns. This study implies that agency theory is superior to resource dependence theory which explains that board size can optimize board performance. Abstrak Studi ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan seberapa efektif mekanisme pemantauan bekerja dalam kondisi financial distress. Dua jenis mekanisme pemantauan dieksplorasi dalam studi yakni: tata kelola perusahaan dan mekanisme pemantauan kepemilikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan 294 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama 3 tahun. Studi ini menggunakan regresi logistik biner untuk menganalisis data empiris. Hasil olahan data menunjukkan bahwa hanya ukuran dewan komisaris dan diversifikasi gender yang mampu membantu perusahaan menghadapi kemerosotan ekonomi. Penelitian ini mengimplikasikan bahwa teori keagenan lebih unggul dibandingkan teori ketergantungan sumber daya yang menjelaskan bahwa ukuran dewan dapat mengoptimalkan kinerja dewan.

show abstract