2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-019-00084-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Biologists’ Conceptions of Science as a Social Epistemology Align with Critical Contextual Empiricism?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we argue CCE is especially pertinent to laboratory education given recent calls advocating for biology education to promote both inquiry and inclusivity (Berland et al 2016;Engle 2006). So, while CCE is often cited and tangentially adopted into "consensus" lists characterizing the nature of science (Abd-El-Khalick et al 2008;Allchin 2014;Irzik and Nola 2014;Niaz and Maza 2011), there has been limited, explicit infusion of CCE into nature of science (Fuselier et al 2019) and by our account no studies exploring how it might be operationalized in the laboratory have been conducted.…”
Section: Critical Contextual Empiricismmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we argue CCE is especially pertinent to laboratory education given recent calls advocating for biology education to promote both inquiry and inclusivity (Berland et al 2016;Engle 2006). So, while CCE is often cited and tangentially adopted into "consensus" lists characterizing the nature of science (Abd-El-Khalick et al 2008;Allchin 2014;Irzik and Nola 2014;Niaz and Maza 2011), there has been limited, explicit infusion of CCE into nature of science (Fuselier et al 2019) and by our account no studies exploring how it might be operationalized in the laboratory have been conducted.…”
Section: Critical Contextual Empiricismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When GTAs withheld agency from students, it inhibited their capacity to envision how their efforts mattered and prevented them from locating themselves in wider community of knowledge producers. The generic community also persisted because GTAs failed to explicitly discuss the community's role in producing objective knowledge; perhaps revealing that they themselves lacked understanding concerning the value of critique and the links among inquiry, argumentation and knowledge production in a scientific community (Fuselier et al, 2019). The inability to foster student agency in the classroom community represents one of the study's most significant results as it highlights the potential usefulness of CCE as a framework for understanding how science literacy might be further operationalized in a non-majors lab.…”
Section: Discouraging Student Epistemic Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%