2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do benign-concordant breast MRI biopsy results require short interval follow-up imaging? Report of longitudinal study and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A VABB diagnosis of a benign lesion is considered reliable when there is agreement between radiological suspicion and histological results [ 20 , 21 ]. In the literature, it is recommended to conduct an MRI examination at 6 months after a benign concordant VABB [ 22 , 23 ]. In contrast, based on our experience, we consider the biopsy result to be adequate without the need for a subsequent MRI 6-month follow-up, depending on factors such as the initial radiological suspicion, imaging findings before and after the biopsy, and concordant histological results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A VABB diagnosis of a benign lesion is considered reliable when there is agreement between radiological suspicion and histological results [ 20 , 21 ]. In the literature, it is recommended to conduct an MRI examination at 6 months after a benign concordant VABB [ 22 , 23 ]. In contrast, based on our experience, we consider the biopsy result to be adequate without the need for a subsequent MRI 6-month follow-up, depending on factors such as the initial radiological suspicion, imaging findings before and after the biopsy, and concordant histological results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions) [ 25 ], the majority of panelists suggest open excision for ADH and PT, while for other B3 lesions (RS, FEA, PL, LIN) VAE is considered an alternative to open excision. High-risk lesions that were diagnosed by MRI VABB, and in which a subsequent diagnosis of invasive cancer or DCIS lesion was made at surgical excision were considered underestimates [ 23 ]. In our study, no upgrades to carcinoma were observed in the MRI-guided biopsies for B3 lesions without atypia (B3a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the lesion nonvisualization rate at procedural CEM (4.5%) was also already lower than the 8-13% estimates reported for MRIguided biopsy [10]. Larger series are however needed to classify nonvisualization causes and to ascertain how background parenchymal enhancement influences CEM-guided biopsy, but also to evaluate its associated radiation dose and the potential role of short-term follow-up for imaging-concordant benign biopsy results-which remains a controversial aspect of MRI-guided biopsy [10,14]. Mirroring the efforts directed at developing non-contrast MRI-guided biopsy based on diffusion-weighted imaging [15], specific studies will also allow to explore the feasibility of a non-contrast version of CEM-guided biopsy, based on artificial intelligence-driven generation of synthetic recombined CEM images [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) has several significant limitations that make it suboptimal for many diagnostic indications, including a high false positive rate, high cost, the need for IV cannulation, and potential side effects of the GBCA [ 6 , 10 ]. Up to one-third of women undergoing DCE-MRI may be called back for follow-up or biopsy, and up to 40% of the resultant breast biopsies are benign [ 11 , 12 ]. Consequently, similar to the situation with MG and US, DCE-MRI scans frequently lead to additional biopsies for lesions that appear suspicious but are subsequently evaluated as benign [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%