2018
DOI: 10.1080/01584197.2018.1535833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do beak volume and bite force influence the song structure of sympatric species of seedeaters (Thraupidae:Sporophila)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2018, Porzio et al. 2019). However, additional bite‐force data are needed to better understand the relationship between the form and function of the avian cranio‐mandibular complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2018, Porzio et al. 2019). However, additional bite‐force data are needed to better understand the relationship between the form and function of the avian cranio‐mandibular complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Birds are underrepresented in the field of vertebrate bite performance, with the literature biased toward reptiles, particularly squamates (Herrel et al 1999, 2001, Verwaijen et al 2002, Baeckens et al 2017, Penning 2017, Baxter-Gilbert and Whiting 2019. Avian bite-force data have been reported for a few taxa, mostly passerines (van der Meij and Bout 2004, 2006, Herrel et al 2005a, 2009, Degrange et al 2010, Soons et al 2010, Sustaita and Hertel 2010, Corbin et al 2015, Rao et al 2018, Porzio et al 2019). However, additional bite-force data are needed to better understand the relationship between the form and function of the avian craniomandibular complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main explanations for this involve mechanical limitations, since singing demands motor, respiratory and nervous structures coordination to achieve specific song patterns (Gil & Gahr 2002, Vehrencamp et al 2013). In trills, note repetition involves rapid air pulses and syrinx movements, while frequency modulation requires mainly syrinx and beak movements (Podos 1997, 2001, but see Porzio et al 2018a,b for different, even opposite, patterns in non-trilled vocalizations). Compared to producing narrower frequency bands, to produce songs with wider ones, birds need to change more their beak gape along singing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%