2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do barriers to export vary for born globals and across stages of internationalization? An empirical inquiry in the emerging market of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
95
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally this study established a high similarity between the export barriers faced by both developed and developing countries especially in the manufacturing industry suggesting that developing nations could learn from their counterparts in the developed nations. Uner et al, (2013) extended Leonidou's model (2004) of barrier classification in conjunction with Cavusgil's (1980) firm classification. Along with the five classifications namely non-exporting firms, pre-exporters, experimental involvement firms, active involvement firms and committed involvement firms, born global firms were added as the sixth classification.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally this study established a high similarity between the export barriers faced by both developed and developing countries especially in the manufacturing industry suggesting that developing nations could learn from their counterparts in the developed nations. Uner et al, (2013) extended Leonidou's model (2004) of barrier classification in conjunction with Cavusgil's (1980) firm classification. Along with the five classifications namely non-exporting firms, pre-exporters, experimental involvement firms, active involvement firms and committed involvement firms, born global firms were added as the sixth classification.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Along with the five classifications namely non-exporting firms, pre-exporters, experimental involvement firms, active involvement firms and committed involvement firms, born global firms were added as the sixth classification. Based on the empirical data from 2159 Turkish firms, Uner et al, (2013) concluded that the export barriers have not significantly varied from the 1970s and 1980s. On comparing their analysis from Turkey with studies by Shaw & Darroch (2004) from New Zealand, Pinho and Martins, (2010) from Portugal, Suarez-Ortega (2003) from Spain, Uner et al, (2013) Uner et al, (2013, p. 811).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the degree of commitment (or mode of operation) could be lower because most born-globals focus on exporting (Coviello, 2015;Madsen & Servais, 1997;Moen & Servais, 2002;Uner, Kocak, Cavusgil, & Cavusgil, 2013), the second dimension of the Uppsala model, international scope, remains an important decision point for bornglobals.…”
Section: Theory Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The export marketing literature promotes firms' innovativeness as a critical export marketing capability (e.g., Kropp, Lindsay & Shoham, 2006;Lages, Silva & Styles, 2009) and as a core driver of exporters' international business success (Calantone, Cavusgil & Zhao, 2006). The studied firms did not deny this but did not see it as being as crucial as it is portrayed in the literature (Uner et al, 2013), which can be caused by the fact that their main task is to develop sales on the local market and support the innovative process written down in the strategy of the whole firm. It may be seen differently by parent companies, which are in 100% of cases responsible for innovativeness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%