2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Bacterial “Virulence Factors” Always Increase Virulence? A Meta-Analysis of Pyoverdine Production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa As a Test Case

Abstract: Bacterial traits that contribute to disease are termed “virulence factors” and there is much interest in therapeutic approaches that disrupt such traits. What remains less clear is whether a virulence factor identified as such in a particular context is also important in infections involving different host and pathogen types. Here, we address this question using a meta-analytic approach. We statistically analyzed the infection outcomes of 81 experiments associated with one well-studied virulence factor—pyoverd… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these secretions were highly correlated, pyoverdine emerged as the greatest contributor to virulence. A recent meta-analysis has shown that in lab strains such as PAO1 and PA14, the effect of pyoverdine, albeit frequently contributing to disease, is relatively minor, and varies considerably across infection models [ 33 ]. While these strains were initially isolated from clinical settings, they have subsequently undergone evolution in the laboratory environment [ 34 ], and hence may differ substantially from the clinical strains used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these secretions were highly correlated, pyoverdine emerged as the greatest contributor to virulence. A recent meta-analysis has shown that in lab strains such as PAO1 and PA14, the effect of pyoverdine, albeit frequently contributing to disease, is relatively minor, and varies considerably across infection models [ 33 ]. While these strains were initially isolated from clinical settings, they have subsequently undergone evolution in the laboratory environment [ 34 ], and hence may differ substantially from the clinical strains used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…241, 242 A recent meta analysis examined the effect of pyoverdine on both plant, insect, and vertebrate infection models, supporting a limited but consistent contribution to virulence. 243 Furthermore, chemical precedent exists for the intervention in the signaling pathways that induce pyoverdine production. The antifungal 5-fluorocytosine has been shown to inhibit the transcriptional regulation of the pyoverdine operon as mediated by the regulator PvdS.…”
Section: Pseudomonas Aeruginosamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FpvA is the specific outer-membrane receptor for pyoverdine-iron complexes and is indispensable for its uptake (Schalk et al, 2001). It has been reported that the production of pyoverdine is important for the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa, but clinical isolates that do not produce this siderophore can be isolated (Tasake et al, 2000;Visca et al, 2006;Kirienko et al, 2013;López-Medina et al, 2015;Granato et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%