Abstract:We extend the empirical analysis of hot hands in sports to horse racing, using the winning streaks of a sample of jockeys riding in Australia. Grouping jockeys by strike rate (win percentage), we find evidence of hot hands across almost all strike rates. But considering jockeys individually, only a minority exhibit hot hands. A wagering strategy based on hot hands yields a negative return overall and for most hot hand jockeys, although some do yield a positive return. We conclude that hot hands are present but… Show more
“…Research on hot hands covers a broad range of different sports, like basketball (see Daks et al., 2018; Arkes, 2013), football (see Salaga & Brown, 2018), golf (see Stone & Arkes, 2016; Livingston, 2012), darts (see Ötting et al., 2020), baseball (see Green & Zwiebel, 2018), and horse racing (see Wrathall et al., 2020). Most of the older evidence suggests that hot hands do not exist (see e.g., Gilovich et al., 1985), so that beliefs in hot hands are wrong.…”
The typical gambler loses money but continues to gamble nonetheless. Why? Research from orthodox and behavioral economics, psychology, sociology, and medicine has offered a wide range of possible explanations. This paper reviews these explanations. The evidence is organized according to the degree of rationality assumed and/or found in the studies. This approach allows research from highly distinctive fields to be integrated within a unified framework. Gambling patterns are so highly dispersed that no satisfying one‐fits‐all explanation is possible. The findings suggest that the whole spectrum from rationality to highly destructive irrationality can be found within the gambler population.
“…Research on hot hands covers a broad range of different sports, like basketball (see Daks et al., 2018; Arkes, 2013), football (see Salaga & Brown, 2018), golf (see Stone & Arkes, 2016; Livingston, 2012), darts (see Ötting et al., 2020), baseball (see Green & Zwiebel, 2018), and horse racing (see Wrathall et al., 2020). Most of the older evidence suggests that hot hands do not exist (see e.g., Gilovich et al., 1985), so that beliefs in hot hands are wrong.…”
The typical gambler loses money but continues to gamble nonetheless. Why? Research from orthodox and behavioral economics, psychology, sociology, and medicine has offered a wide range of possible explanations. This paper reviews these explanations. The evidence is organized according to the degree of rationality assumed and/or found in the studies. This approach allows research from highly distinctive fields to be integrated within a unified framework. Gambling patterns are so highly dispersed that no satisfying one‐fits‐all explanation is possible. The findings suggest that the whole spectrum from rationality to highly destructive irrationality can be found within the gambler population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.