Do anti-VEGFs used in the ophthalmic clinic cause Müller glial cell stress?

Silva, Rafael André da; Ferreira, Luiz Philipe de Souza; Roda, Vinicius Moraes de Paiva; Soares, José Maria; Simões, Manuel de Jesus; Regatieri, Caio

doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100161

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Anti-VEGF agents are commonly utilized in ophthalmic clinics to treat neovascularization in retinal vascular diseases, and their efficacy has been documented in several independent phase-III clinical trials [3][4][5]. However, despite their ability to diminish retinal vascularization and vascular leakage, VEGF inhibition agents such as aflibercept, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, and bevacizumab may disrupt retinal homeostasis due to the essential role of VEGF in retinal neurons and glial cells survival [6][7][8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of aflibercept and bevacizumab on cell viability, cell metabolism and inflammation in hypoxic human Müller cells

Matsuda,

da Silva,

Roda

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) drugs such as aflibercept (AFL) and bevacizumab (BVZ) inhibit pathological neo-angiogenesis and vascular permeability in retinal vascular diseases. As cytokines and growth factors are produced by Müller glial cells under stressful and pathological conditions, we evaluated the in vitro effect of AFL (Eylea®, 0.5 mg/mL) and BVZ (Avastin®, 0.5 mg/mL) on cell viability/metabolism, and cytokine/growth factor production by Müller cells (MIO-M1) under cobalt chloride (CoCl2)-induced hypoxia after 24h, 48h and 72h. Cell viability/metabolism were analyzed by Trypan Blue and MTT assays and cytokine/growth factors in supernatants by Luminex xMAP-based multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Cell viability increased with AFL at 48h and 72h and decreased with BVZ or hypoxia at 24h. BVZ-treated cells showed lower cell viability than AFL at all exposure times. Cell metabolism increased with AFL but decreased with BVZ (72h) and hypoxia (48h and72h). As expected, AFL and BVZ decreased VEGF levels. AFL increased PDGF-BB, IL-6 and TNF-α (24h) and BVZ increased PDGF-BB (72h). Hypoxia reduced IL-1β, -6, -8, TNF-α and PDGF-BB at 24h, and its suppressive effect was more prominent than AFL (EGF, PDGF-BB, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) and BVZ (PDGF-BB and IL-6) effects. Hypoxia increased bFGF levels at 48h and 72h, even when combined with anti-VEGFs. However, the stimulatory effect of BVZ predominated over hypoxia for IL-8 and TNF-α (24h), as well as for IL-1β (72h). Thus, AFL and BVZ exhibit distinct exposure times effects on MIO-M1 cells viability, metabolism, and cytokines/growth factors. Hypoxia and BVZ decreased MIO-M1 cell viability/metabolism, whereas AFL likely induced gliosis. Hypoxia resulted in immunosuppression, and BVZ stimulated inflammation in hypoxic MIO-M1 cells. These findings highlight the complexity of the cellular response as well as the interplay between anti-VEGF treatments and the hypoxic microenvironment.

show abstract